Real Mazda 6 fuel consumption
Mazda 6 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 17% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 22% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Mazda 6 produced from 2002 to 2022. For Mazda 6 produced up to 2012 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +9%, while for those produced after 2012 it is on average +25%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2018
Mazda 6 2018 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +18% Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
2018
Mazda 6 2018 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +16% Average real diesel consumption difference: +25%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
2.0Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-G 2.0 145 Hp 145 HP MT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+17% |
2.0Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-G 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+6% |
2.0Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-G 2.0 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP AT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+19% |
2.2Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-D 2.2 150 Hp 150 HP MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+33% |
2.2Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-D 2.2 184 Hp 184 HP MT | Diesel | 4.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km+10% |
2.2Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-D 2.2 184 Hp Automatic 184 HP AT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+31% |
2.5Mazda 6 2018 SportBreak SkyActiv-G 2.5 AT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+21% |
2015
Mazda 6 2015 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +23% Average real diesel consumption difference: +48%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
2.0Mazda 6 2015 2.0 150 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | |
2.0Mazda 6 2015 2.0 Automatic 150 HP AT | Petrol | 6.1 l/100km | |
2.0MAZDA 6 2015 / Atenza Sedan 2.0L SKYACTIV-G 165 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+18% |
2.0MAZDA 6 2015 / Atenza Sedan 2.0L SKYACTIV-G Automatic 165 HP AT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+27% |
2.2MAZDA 6 2015 / Atenza Sedan 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 150 Hp 150 HP MT | Diesel | 3.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+56% |
2.2MAZDA 6 2015 / Atenza Sedan 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP AT | Diesel | 4.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+44% |
2.2MAZDA 6 2015 / Atenza Sedan 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 175 Hp 175 HP MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+40% |
2.2MAZDA 6 2015 / Atenza Sedan 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 175 Hp Automatic 175 HP AT | Diesel | 4.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+50% |
2.5Mazda 6 2015 2.5 AT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+23% |
2015
Mazda 6 2015 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +22% Average real diesel consumption difference: +34%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
2.0Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.0 145 Hp 145 HP MT | Petrol | 5.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+20% |
2.0Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+18% |
2.0Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP AT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+27% |
2.2Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.2 SkyActiv-D 150 Hp 150 HP MT | Diesel | 4.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+39% |
2.2Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.2 SkyActiv-D 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP AT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+37% |
2.2Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.2 SkyActiv-D AWD 150 Hp 150 HP MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+22% |
2.2Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.2 SkyActiv-D 175 Hp 175 HP MT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+29% |
2.2Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.2 SkyActiv-D 175 Hp Automatic 175 HP AT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+39% |
2.2Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.2 SkyActiv-D AWD 175 Hp Automatic 175 HP AT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+39% |
2.5Mazda 6 2015 SportBreak 2.5 AT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+25% |
2012
Mazda 6 2012 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +22% Average real diesel consumption difference: +35%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
2.0Mazda 6 2012 SportBreak 2.0 145 Hp 145 HP MT | Petrol | 5.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+20% |
2.0Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+20% |
2.0Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP AT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.2D 150 HP MT | Diesel | 4.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+36% |
2.2Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.2D Automatic 150 HP AT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+33% |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 HP MT | Diesel | 4.6 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D Automatic 175 HP AT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | |
2.5Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.5 AT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+25% |
2012
Mazda 6 2012 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +24% Average real diesel consumption difference: +54%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
2.0Mazda 6 2012 2.0 150 Hp 150 HP MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | |
2.0Mazda 6 2012 2.0 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP AT | Petrol | 6.1 l/100km | |
2.0Mazda 6 2012 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP MT | Petrol | 5.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+22% |
2.0Mazda 6 2012 2.0 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP AT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 Automatic AT | Petrol | 4.8 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 150 HP MT | Diesel | 3.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+54% |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP AT | Diesel | 4.8 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 Hp 175 HP MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 Hp Automatic 175 HP AT | Diesel | 4.8 l/100km | |
2.5Mazda 6 2012 2.5 AT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+27% |
2010
Mazda 6 2010 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +16% Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2010 1.8 MT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+23% |
2.0Mazda 6 2010 2.0 MT | Petrol | 7.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+15% |
2.0Mazda 6 2010 2.0 Automatic AT | Petrol | 7.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+18% |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 2.2 CiTD 129 Hp 129 HP MT | Diesel | 5.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 2.2 CiTD 163 Hp 163 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+22% |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 2.2 CiTD 180 Hp 180 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+24% |
2.5Mazda 6 2010 2.5 MT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+8% |
2010
Mazda 6 2010 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +15% Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2010 SportBreak 1.8 MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+21% |
2.0Mazda 6 2010 SportBreak 2.0 MT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+17% |
2.0Mazda 6 2010 2.0 AT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 129 Hp 129 HP MT | Diesel | 5.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 163 Hp 163 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+22% |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD GT-M 180 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+24% |
2.5Mazda 6 2010 SportBreak 2.5 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+7% |
2010
Mazda 6 2010 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2010 1.8 MT | 6.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+25% |
2.0Mazda 6 2010 2.0 MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+6% |
2.0Mazda 6 2010 2.0 Automatic AT | 7.7 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 2.2 CD 129 Hp 129 HP MT | 5.2 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2010 2.2 CD 180 Hp 180 HP MT | 5.4 l/100km | |
2.5Mazda 6 2010 2.5 MT | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+8% |
2.5Mazda 6 2010 2.5 Automatic AT | 8.4 l/100km | |
3.7Mazda 6 2010 3.7 V6 AT | 10.3 l/100km |
2008
Mazda 6 2008 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11% Average real diesel consumption difference: +15%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+13% |
2.0Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.0 S-VT MT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+14% |
2.0Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.0 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 7.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+10% |
2.0Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.0 CiTD MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+10% |
2.2Mazda 6 2009 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 163 Hp 163 HP MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+18% |
2.2Mazda 6 2009 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 185 Hp 185 HP MT | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+18% |
2.5Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.5 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+6% |
2008
Mazda 6 2008 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2008 Sport 1.8 MT | 6.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+14% |
2.0Mazda 6 2008 Sport 2.0 i MT | 7.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+14% |
2.0Mazda 6 2008 Sport 2.0 i Automatic AT | 7.7 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+12% |
2.0Mazda 6 2008 2.0 CD MT | 5.6 l/100km | |
2.2Mazda 6 2008 2.2 CD MT | 5.6 l/100km | |
2.5Mazda 6 2008 2.5 Sport AT | 8.1 l/100km | |
2.5Mazda 6 2008 2.5 MT | 8.0 l/100km |
2007
Mazda 6 2007 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13% Average real diesel consumption difference: +18%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2007 1.8 MT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+16% |
2.0Mazda 6 2007 2.0 S-VT MT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+17% |
2.0Mazda 6 2007 2.0 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+13% |
2.0Mazda 6 2007 2.0 CiTD MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+18% |
2.2Mazda 6 2007 2.2 CD MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | |
2.5Mazda 6 2007 2.5 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+7% |
3.7Mazda 6 2008 3.7 V6 AT | Petrol | 11.0 l/100km |
2005
Mazda 6 2005 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2005 Sport 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+6% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 Sport 2.0 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+5% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 Sport 2.0 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 8.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+12% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 Sport 2.0 CiTD 121 Hp 121 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+10% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 Sport 2.0 CiTD 143 Hp 143 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+15% |
2.3Mazda 6 2005 Sport 2.3 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+6% |
2.3Mazda 6 2005 Sport 2.3 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 8.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+15% |
2005
Mazda 6 2005 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8% Average real diesel consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+5% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 2.0 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+5% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 2.0 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+10% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 2.0 CiTD 121 Hp 121 HP MT | Diesel | 6.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+8% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 2.0 CiTD 143 Hp 143 HP MT | Diesel | 6.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+13% |
2.3Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 2.3 S-VT MT | Petrol | 8.8 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+5% |
2.3Mazda 6 2005 SportBreak 2.3 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 9.0 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+13% |
2005
Mazda 6 2005 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10% Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2005 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+8% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 2.0 S-VT MT | Petrol | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+8% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 2.0 S-VT Automatic AT | Petrol | 8.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+12% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 2.0 CiTD 121 Hp 121 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+10% |
2.0Mazda 6 2005 2.0 CiTD 143 Hp 143 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+15% |
2.3Mazda 6 2005 2.3 S-VT 166 HP MT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+6% |
2.3Mazda 6 2005 2.3 S-VT Automatic 166 HP AT | Petrol | 8.8 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+16% |
2.3Mazda 6 2006 2.3 DISI Turbo MPS 260 HP MT 4x4 | Petrol | 10.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km+13% |
2002
Mazda 6 2002 hatchback
Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2002 Sport 1.8 MT | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km-1% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 Sport 2.0 MT | 8.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km-1% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 Sport 2.0 Automatic AT | 8.8 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km0% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 Sport 2.0 CiTD 120 Hp 120 HP MT | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+5% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 Sport 2.0 CiTD 136 Hp 136 HP MT | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+6% |
2.3Mazda 6 2002 Sport 2.3 S-VT MT | 9.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+1% |
2002
Mazda 6 2002 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 1.8 MT | Petrol | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km-1% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 2.0 MT | Petrol | 8.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km-1% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 2.0 Automatic AT | Petrol | 9.0 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km-2% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 2.0 CiTD 120 Hp 120 HP MT | Diesel | 6.6 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+3% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 2.0 CiTD 136 Hp 136 HP MT | Diesel | 6.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+8% |
2.3Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 2.3 S-VT AWD AT | Petrol | 10.5 l/100km | |
2.3Mazda 6 2002 SportBreak 2.3 S-VT MT | Petrol | 9.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+1% |
2002
Mazda 6 2002 sedan
Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda 6 versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Mazda 6 2002 1.8 MT | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km-1% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 2.0 MT | 8.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km-1% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 2.0 Automatic AT | 8.8 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km0% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 2.0 CiTD 120 Hp 120 HP MT | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+5% |
2.0Mazda 6 2002 2.0 CiTD 136 Hp 136 HP MT | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+6% |
2.3Mazda 6 2002 2.3 S-VT MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+3% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.