Car reviews Car technical data Find your car

Compare cars

Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Recently trending car comparisons

Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 2.7 vs Toyota RAV4 2006 2.4
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 1.9
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing belt engine
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Citroen C8 2008 2.0 vs Fiat Freemont 2011 2.0
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Touareg 2007 2.5 vs Volvo XC90 2006 2.4
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Toyota Auris 2015 1.2 vs Toyota Avensis 2015 1.6
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Volvo XC70 2007 2.4 vs Volvo XC60 2008 2.4
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 vs Toyota Avensis 2006 1.8
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Kia Sorento 2006 2.5 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006 2.2
  • more power
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.4 vs Citroen C1 2008 1.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2006 2.4 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.5
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 vs Toyota Corolla 2012 1.8
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 vs Subaru Forester 2008 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Kia Sorento 2009 2.2 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2010 2.0 vs Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Mazda CX-7 2009 2.2 vs BMW 5 series 2010 2.0
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003 2.0
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Honda Accord 2015 2.0 vs Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Honda Jazz 2004 1.3 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994 1.4
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Audi Q7 2006 3.0 vs Volvo XC90 2006 2.4
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
Follow us on Facebook!
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv