Real Mazda fuel consumption
According to user reviews, average Mazda real daily fuel consumption is approximately 9% higher for petrol engines and is approximately 16% higher for diesel engines compared to the manufacturer's stated consumption. Interestingly, the average fuel consumption difference for Mazda cars produced in the last ten years is about approximately +26% , while older Mazda cars consume approximately 11% more compared to the manufacturer's claimed consumption (more about Mazda fuel economy). Select an Mazda model to see the real fuel consumption of specific engine versions.
Mazda 626
Real petrol consumption difference: +6% Real diesel consumption difference: +4%
Mazda 121
Real petrol consumption difference: minor
Mazda MX-3
Real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Mazda Premacy
Real petrol consumption difference: +6% Real diesel consumption difference: +6%
Mazda 6
Real petrol consumption difference: +13% Real diesel consumption difference: +22%
Mazda CX-7
Real petrol consumption difference: +10% Real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Mazda 3
Real petrol consumption difference: +15% Real diesel consumption difference: +28%
Mazda 323
Real petrol consumption difference: +9% Real diesel consumption difference: +10%
Mazda 2
Real petrol consumption difference: +17% Real diesel consumption difference: +19%
Mazda 5
Real petrol consumption difference: +15% Real diesel consumption difference: +15%
Mazda MPV
Real petrol consumption difference: minor Real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Mazda MX-5
Real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Mazda MX-6
Real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Mazda RX-8
Real petrol consumption difference: +12%
Mazda CX-5
Real petrol consumption difference: +19% Real diesel consumption difference: +35%
Mazda CX-3
Real petrol consumption difference: +19%
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.