Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare
Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years old

Most compared crossovers more than 15 years old

Most compared sedans more than 15 years old Most compared hatchbacks more than 15 years old Most compared estate cars more than 15 years old Most compared crossovers more than 15 years old Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old Most compared coupes more than 15 years old Most compared minivans more than 15 years old
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 1.9 vs Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2
  • timing belt engine
  • fewer faults
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Hyundai ix35 2009 2.0 vs BMW X1 2015 2.0
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Touareg 2007 2.5 vs Volvo XC90 2006 2.4
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Kia Sorento 2009 2.2 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 vs Subaru Forester 2008 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 vs Audi Q7 2006 3.0
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Hyundai Santa FE 2006 2.2 vs Kia Sorento 2006 2.5
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • higher safety
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2010 2.0 vs Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Mercedes GLK 2008 3.0 vs Mercedes ML 2008 3.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 vs Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0
  • timing belt engine
  • roomier boot
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2007 2.4 vs Honda CR-V 2010 2.4
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 vs Honda CR-V 2004 2.2
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 vs Volvo XC60 2008 2.4
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 2.4 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.5
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.5
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 vs Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Subaru Forester 2008 2.0 vs Subaru Forester 2011 2.0
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.5 vs Subaru Forester 2011 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing belt engine
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006 2.2
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
Follow us on Facebook!
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv