Hyundai ix35 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 164 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 149 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |