Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years old

Most compared coupes more than 15 years old

Most compared sedans more than 15 years old Most compared hatchbacks more than 15 years old Most compared estate cars more than 15 years old Most compared crossovers more than 15 years old Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old Most compared coupes more than 15 years old Most compared minivans more than 15 years old
Audi A5 2007 2.0 vs BMW 3 series 2010 2.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Dodge Charger 2005 3.5 vs Ford Mustang 2005 4.0
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 1.4 vs BMW 1 series 2007 2.0
    • more power
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • higher ground clearance
    full specification comparison
    Hyundai Coupe 2006 2.7 vs Hyundai Coupe 1996 2.0
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Ford Mustang 2005 4.0 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 3.8
      • more power
      • roomier boot
      • lower price
      full specification comparison
      Mazda RX-8 2008 1.3 vs Mazda RX-8 2003 1.3
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • roomier boot
        • lower price
        full specification comparison
        Audi A5 2007 3.0 vs BMW 3 series 2006 3.0
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • has 4x4 drive
        • lower price
        full specification comparison
        Audi S5 2007 4.2 vs Audi A5 2007 2.7
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • has 4x4 drive
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • lower price
        full specification comparison
        Mazda RX-8 2008 1.3 vs Alfa Romeo GT 2004 1.7
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • better manoeuvrability
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 vs Audi TT 2006 1.8
        • more power
        • lower price
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • fewer faults
        full specification comparison
        BMW 3 series 2006 2.0 vs BMW 3 series 2010 2.0
        • lower price
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        full specification comparison
        Mercedes CLS 2008 5.5 vs Mercedes CLS 2004 5.0
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • electric power steering
        full specification comparison
        Ford Mustang 2005 4.0 vs Ford Mustang 2014 2.3
        • lower price
        • more power
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        BMW 3 series 2006 3.0 vs BMW 6 series 2004 3.0
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • lower price
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • longer expected engine lifespan
        full specification comparison
        Hyundai Coupe 2006 2.0 vs Hyundai Coupe 2001 1.6
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        Audi TT 2006 1.8 vs Audi TT 2014 2.0
        • lower price
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • lower fuel consumption
        full specification comparison
        Audi TT 2006 2.0 vs BMW 1 series 2007 2.0
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • fewer faults
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        full specification comparison
        Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 3.8 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2008 3.6
        • roomier boot
        • lower price
        • more power
        full specification comparison
        Dodge Charger 2005 2.7 vs Ford Mustang 2009 5.4
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • roomier boot
        • more power
        • better manoeuvrability
        full specification comparison
        BMW 3 series 2006 2.0 vs Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        • longer expected engine lifespan
        • lower price
        full specification comparison
        Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
        Follow us on Facebook!
        Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv