Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared cars 8 - 14 years old

Most compared sedans 8 - 14 years old Most compared hatchbacks 8 - 14 years old Most compared estate cars 8 - 14 years old Most compared crossovers 8 - 14 years old Most compared cabrios 8 - 14 years old Most compared coupes 8 - 14 years old Most compared minivans 8 - 14 years old
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 vs Ford S-Max 2010 2.0
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Opel Combo 2012 1.6 vs Fiat Doblo 2010 1.2
      • more full fuel tank mileage
      • lower price
      full specification comparison
      Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 vs Seat Alhambra 2010 2.0
      • roomier boot
      • higher children safety
      • lower price
        full specification comparison
        Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 1.8 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6
        • more power
        • fewer faults
        • more dynamic
        • lower fuel consumption
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        Ford C-Max 2007 1.6 vs Renault Scenic 2009 1.5
        • lower fuel consumption
        • roomier boot
        • fewer faults
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        full specification comparison
        Ford S-Max 2006 2.3 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 2.4
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • better manoeuvrability
        • lower price
        full specification comparison
        Renault Espace 2006 2.0 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0
        • lower price
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        full specification comparison
        Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.9
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • higher ground clearance
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.9 vs Ford Tourneo 2010 1.8
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • lower fuel consumption
          full specification comparison
          Volkswagen Touran 2006 2.0 vs Ford S-Max 2006 2.0
          • lower fuel consumption
          • fewer faults
          • lower price
          • more full fuel tank mileage
          full specification comparison
          Ford S-Max 2010 1.6 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.6
            • more power
            • more dynamic
            • lower fuel consumption
            full specification comparison
            Toyota Hiace 2004 2.7 vs Toyota Sienna 2005 3.5
            • lower price
            • more power
            • more wide spread and longer produced engine
            full specification comparison
            Opel Meriva 2013 1.4 vs Opel Zafira 2011 1.4
            • lower fuel consumption
            • lower price
            • roomier boot
            full specification comparison
            Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 1.6 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009 1.5
              • lower price
              full specification comparison
              Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 vs Ford C-Max 2010 2.0
              • higher ratings in user reviews
              • lower price
              • more dynamic
              • lower fuel consumption
              • more full fuel tank mileage
              full specification comparison
              Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 vs Ford Tourneo 2010 1.8
              • lower fuel consumption
              • more full fuel tank mileage
              • better manoeuvrability
              • more dynamic
              full specification comparison
              Opel Combo 2004 1.7 vs Ford Tourneo 2010 1.8
              • more power
              • lower fuel consumption
              • more full fuel tank mileage
                full specification comparison
                Volkswagen Touran 2006 1.6 vs Mazda 5 2008 1.8
                • fewer faults
                • more power
                • more dynamic
                • better manoeuvrability
                full specification comparison
                Renault Espace 2010 2.0 vs Renault Grand Espace 2010 2.0
                • more full fuel tank mileage
                • lower price
                • more power
                • more dynamic
                full specification comparison
                Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000 2.0
                • more power
                • more dynamic
                • lower fuel consumption
                • fewer faults
                • lower price
                full specification comparison
                Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
                Follow us on Facebook!
                Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv