Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years old

Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old

Most compared sedans more than 15 years old Most compared hatchbacks more than 15 years old Most compared estate cars more than 15 years old Most compared crossovers more than 15 years old Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old Most compared coupes more than 15 years old Most compared minivans more than 15 years old
Volvo C70 2006 2.0 vs SAAB 9-3 2007 1.9
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    full specification comparison
    Audi A5 2008 3.2 vs BMW 3 series 2007 3.0
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    full specification comparison
    BMW 3 series 2007 2.5 vs Mercedes CLK 2005 3.0
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • more power
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8 vs SAAB 9-3 2007 2.0
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • roomier boot
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • fewer faults
    full specification comparison
    Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Renault Megane 2010 1.5
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • fewer faults
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    full specification comparison
    Mitsubishi Colt 2007 1.5 vs Nissan Micra 2005 1.6
    • fewer faults
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    BMW 3 series 2007 2.0 vs BMW 3 series 2003 2.0
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    full specification comparison
    Mitsubishi Colt 2007 1.5 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2003 1.4
    • timing chain engine
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • timing belt engine
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    full specification comparison
    BMW Z4 2009 3.0 vs Mercedes SLK 2004 3.5
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • fewer faults
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    full specification comparison
    Mazda MX-5 2008 2.0 vs Mazda MX-5 2005 2.0
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
      full specification comparison
      Mazda MX-5 2008 1.8 vs Mazda MX-5 2015 2.0
      • roomier boot
      • hydraulic power steering
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • lower fuel consumption
      full specification comparison
      Renault Megane 2006 1.9 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 2.4
      • lower fuel consumption
      • more full fuel tank mileage
      • better manoeuvrability
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • roomier boot
      full specification comparison
      Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Renault Megane 2003 1.9
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • more wide spread and longer produced engine
      • lower fuel consumption
      • more full fuel tank mileage
      • better manoeuvrability
      full specification comparison
      Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Renault Megane 2006 1.9
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • lower fuel consumption
      • better manoeuvrability
      • lower price
      full specification comparison
      Audi TT 2007 2.0 vs BMW Z4 2006 2.5
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • lower fuel consumption
      • better manoeuvrability
      full specification comparison
      Nissan Micra 2005 1.4 vs Opel Tigra 2004 1.4
      • better manoeuvrability
      • fewer faults
      • lower fuel consumption
      • more full fuel tank mileage
      • lower price
      full specification comparison
      BMW Z4 2009 2.5 vs Mercedes SLK 2011 1.8
      • lower price
      • more dynamic
      • lower fuel consumption
      • roomier boot
      full specification comparison
      Chrysler Sebring 2007 2.7 vs Volvo C70 2006 2.4
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • better manoeuvrability
      • lower fuel consumption
      • more full fuel tank mileage
      full specification comparison
      Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Volvo C70 2006 2.0
      • more power
      • more dynamic
      • fewer faults
        full specification comparison
        Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8 vs Audi TT 2007 2.0
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • longer expected engine lifespan
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
        Follow us on Facebook!
        Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv