Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years old

Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old

BMW 3 series 2007 3.0 vs Audi A5 2008 3.2
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
BMW 3 series 2007 2.5 vs Mercedes CLK 2005 3.0
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Renault Megane 2010 1.5
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
BMW 3 series 2007 2.0 vs BMW 3 series 2003 2.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
BMW Z4 2009 3.0 vs Mercedes SLK 2004 3.5
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
full specification comparison
SAAB 9-3 2007 1.9 vs Volvo C70 2006 2.4
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Renault Megane 2006 1.9
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Opel Astra 2007 1.9 vs Renault Megane 2003 1.9
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Audi TT 2007 2.0 vs BMW Z4 2006 2.5
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
BMW Z4 2009 2.5 vs Mercedes SLK 2011 1.8
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Renault Megane 2010 1.5 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011 2.0
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Chrysler Sebring 2007 2.7 vs Volvo C70 2006 2.4
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Audi TT 2007 2.0 vs Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
full specification comparison
Fiat 500 2010 1.2 vs Audi A3 2008 1.8
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Mazda MX-5 2008 2.0 vs BMW Z4 2009 2.5
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Audi A5 2008 2.0 vs SAAB 9-3 2010 1.9
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Opel Tigra 2004 1.8 vs Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Opel Tigra 2004 1.4 vs Nissan Micra 2005 1.6
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
SAAB 9-3 2010 2.0 vs Opel Astra 2007 1.6
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv