Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years old

Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old

Volvo C70 2009 2.4 vs Audi A5 2008 2.7
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Golf 2011 2.0 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011 2.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Mercedes SLK 2011 1.8 vs Mazda MX-5 2015 1.5
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
BMW 6 series 2007 3.0 vs Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
full specification comparison
Volkswagen EOS 2006 1.6 vs Opel Astra 2007 1.8
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
BMW Z4 2009 2.5 vs Mercedes SLK 2011 1.8
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Volvo C70 2009 2.4 vs Lexus IS 2008 2.5
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Volvo C70 2009 2.4 vs BMW 3 series 2007 2.5
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Audi A5 2008 2.0 vs Lexus IS 2008 2.5
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
full specification comparison
BMW 6 series 2007 4.8 vs Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8 vs Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Golf 2011 2.0 vs BMW 2 series 2013 2.0
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Audi A3 2008 1.8 vs Mazda MX-5 2005 2.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
BMW 6 series 2007 3.0 vs Audi TT 2007 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Fiat 500 2010 1.2 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2013 1.2
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
BMW 3 series 2010 2.0 vs Audi A5 2011 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Golf 2011 1.6 vs Audi A5 2011 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
full specification comparison
Audi A5 2011 3.0 vs BMW 6 series 2011 3.0
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv