Dodge Charger 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011

 
Dodge Charger
2010 - 2015
Chevrolet Camaro
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.6 Petrol3.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 296 HP312 HP
Torque: 353 NM377 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Dodge Charger engine produces 16 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.011.1
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Dodge Charger consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway850 km on highway
Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Charger engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & CountryUsed also on Chevrolet Equinox
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger might be a better choice in this respect.
Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles. After ...  More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.84 m
Width: 1.91 m1.92 m
Height: 1.48 m1.38 m
Dodge Charger is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 467 litres320 litres
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity.
Dodge Charger has 147 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro.
Turning diameter: 11.5 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): no data1`700
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data16 400
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Chevrolet Camaro has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv