Dodge Charger 2012 vs Dodge Charger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.4 Petrol | 6.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 477 HP | 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 637 NM | 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2012 engine produces 45 HP more power than Dodge Charger 2006, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Dodge Charger 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 14.7 | |
|
The Dodge Charger 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger 2012 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2006, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2012 and Dodge Charger 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger 2006 has more luggage space. Dodge Charger 2012 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |