Audi A3 2008 vs Volvo C70 2009

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP136 HP
Torque: 250 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds11 seconds
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.16.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.5 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1060 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.62 m
Width: 1.76 m1.84 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Audi A3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Audi A3 is 38 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
674 litresno data
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`925 kg2`130 kg
Net weight:1`425 kg1`740 kg
Load capacity:500 kg390 kg
Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Volvo C70. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 54007200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volvo C70 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv