Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Car comparison tool allows you to compare cars side by side. It compares technical parameters - power, fuel consumption, dimensions and so on as well as car prices,quality and safety assessments.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars 8-14 years old

Most compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared sedans more than 15 years old Most compared hatchbacks more than 15 years old Most compared estate cars more than 15 years old Most compared crossovers more than 15 years old Most compared cabrios more than 15 years old Most compared coupes more than 15 years old Most compared minivans more than 15 years old
Opel Combo 2004 1.2 vs Renault Kangoo 2005 1.5
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 vs Opel Zafira 2003 1.8
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 2.2
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Touran 2006 1.9 vs Opel Zafira 2005 1.9
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Ford C-Max 2007 1.6 vs Renault Scenic 2009 1.5
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Opel Zafira 2005 1.9 vs Ford S-Max 2006 2.0
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 vs Ford C-Max 2010 2.0
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.9 vs Ford Tourneo 2010 1.8
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
    full specification comparison
    Honda FR-V 2007 1.8 vs Honda FR-V 2004 1.7
    • timing chain engine
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • timing belt engine
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    full specification comparison
    Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 vs Ford Tourneo 2010 1.8
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • more dynamic
    full specification comparison
    Ford S-Max 2006 2.3 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 2.4
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.9
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • fewer faults
    full specification comparison
    Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 1.8 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6
    • more power
    • fewer faults
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    Opel Zafira 2005 1.8 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8
    • timing belt engine
    • more power
    • better manoeuvrability
    • timing chain engine
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 vs Toyota Avensis Verso 2003 2.0
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Toyota Hiace 2004 2.7 vs Toyota Sienna 2005 3.5
    • lower price
    • more power
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    full specification comparison
    Toyota Sienna 2005 3.5 vs Toyota Sienna 2003 3.3
    • timing chain engine
    • more power
    • more wide spread and longer produced engine
    • timing belt engine
    • lower fuel consumption
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Opel Zafira 2005 1.9 vs Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    full specification comparison
    Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 1.6 vs Renault Scenic 2006 1.5
    • roomier boot
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    full specification comparison
    Volkswagen Touran 2006 2.0 vs Ford S-Max 2006 2.0
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
    Contact us: [email protected]