Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Toyota Sienna 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 266 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 392 NM | 328 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna 2010 engine produces 36 HP more power than Toyota Sienna 2005, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Toyota Sienna 2005. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 11.5 | |
|
The Toyota Sienna 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Sienna 2010 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Sienna 2010 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Sienna 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus RX, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Sienna 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Sienna 2010 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Sienna 2010 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna 2005, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3810 litres | 4217 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna 2005 has more luggage space. Toyota Sienna 2010 has 242 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna 2005. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna 2005 (by 407 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |