Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Touran and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 46 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Volkswagen Touran has 114 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Touran can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |