Real Mazda CX-5 fuel consumption
Mazda CX-5 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 27% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 19% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 35% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017
Mazda CX-5 2017
Average real diesel consumption difference: +31%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda CX-5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2017 SkyActiv-G 2.0 155 HP AT | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160 Hp 160 HP MT 4x4 | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 Hp 165 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 Hp 165 HP MT 4x4 | 7.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 Hp 165 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP AT 4x4 | 7.0 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2018 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 HP AT | 5.5 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2017 SkyActiv-D 2.2 4x4 175 HP AT | 5.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+31% |
| 2.5Mazda CX-5 2017 SkyActiv-G 2.5 194 HP AT | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 2.5Mazda CX-5 2017 SkyActiv-G 2.5 4x4 194 HP AT | 7.1 l/100km | |
| 2.5Mazda CX-5 2019 2.5 Turbo SKYACTIV-G 228 HP AT | 7.3 l/100km | |
| 2.5Mazda CX-5 2019 2.5 SKYACTIV-G 250 HP AT 4x4 | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 3.6Mazda CX-5 2019 3.6 2.5 SKYACTIV-G AT | 6.6 l/100km |
2015
Mazda CX-5 2015
Average real petrol consumption difference: +19% Average real diesel consumption difference: +29%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda CX-5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 AWD 150 HP AT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 150 HP MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 Automatic 150 HP AT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2015 2.2d 150 HP MT 4x4 | Diesel | 5.2 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2015 2.2d 150 HP MT | Diesel | 4.6 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2015 2.2d Automatic 150 HP AT | Diesel | 4.7 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2015 2.2d Automatic 150 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2015 2.2 D AWD 175 HP AT | Diesel | 5.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+29% |
| 2.5Mazda CX-5 2015 2.5 AWD AT | Petrol | 7.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+19% |
2012
Mazda CX-5 2012
Average real diesel consumption difference: +46%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mazda CX-5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0i 4WD 150 HP AT | 6.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0i 2WD 150 HP MT | 6.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0i 2WD Automatic 150 HP AT | 6.3 l/100km | |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2012 SkyActiv-D 2.2 150 HP MT | 4.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+50% |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2012 SkyActiv-D 2.2 Automatic 150 HP AT | 5.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+42% |
| 2.2Mazda CX-5 2012 SkyActiv-D 2.2 4WD 175 HP AT | 5.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+45% |
| 2.5Mazda CX-5 2013 2.5 SKYACTIV-G 4WD AT | 7.3 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.