Real Honda Civic fuel consumption
Honda Civic real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 14% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 10% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 17% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Honda Civic produced from 1995 to 2022. For Honda Civic produced up to 2009 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +10%, while for those produced after 2009 it is on average +22%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017
Honda Civic 2017 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +29%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0Honda Civic 2017 1.0 MT | 4.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+31% |
1.0Honda Civic 2017 1.0 AT | 4.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+49% |
1.5Honda Civic 2017 1.5 MT | 5.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+14% |
1.5Honda Civic 2017 1.5 AT | 5.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+22% |
2014
Honda Civic 2014 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +16% Average real diesel consumption difference: +32%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.6Honda Civic 2014 Tourer 1.6 MT | Diesel | 3.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km+32% |
1.8Honda Civic 2014 Tourer 1.8 MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+16% |
1.8Honda Civic 2014 Tourer 1.8 AT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+15% |
2012
Honda Civic 2012 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +19%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Honda Civic 2012 1.3 1.4 i-VTEC MT | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+13% |
1.8Honda Civic 2012 1.8 i-VTEC AT | 6.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+19% |
1.8Honda Civic 2012 1.8 i-VTEC MT | 5.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+24% |
2.2Honda Civic 2012 2.2 i-DTEC AT | 4.4 l/100km |
2012
Honda Civic 2012 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Honda Civic 2012 1.8 i-VTEC AT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+9% |
1.8Honda Civic 2012 1.8 i-VTEC MT | 6.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+8% |
2008
Honda Civic 2008 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +15% Average real diesel consumption difference: +20%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 1.4 MT | Petrol | 5.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+12% |
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 1.4 AT | Petrol | 5.7 l/100km | |
1.8Honda Civic 2008 1.8 MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+15% |
1.8Honda Civic 2008 1.8 AT | Petrol | 7.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+18% |
2.2Honda Civic 2008 2.2 CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+20% |
2008
Honda Civic 2008 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +19%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 i-DSi i-VTEC IMA AT | 4.6 l/100km | |
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 1.4i MT | 5.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+14% |
1.6Honda Civic 2011 1.6 i-VTEC MT | 6.7 l/100km | |
1.6Honda Civic 2011 1.6 i-VTEC AT | 7.1 l/100km | |
1.8Honda Civic 2008 1.8 MT | 6.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+17% |
1.8Honda Civic 2008 1.8 AT | 6.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+27% |
2008
Honda Civic 2008 3 door hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +15% Average real diesel consumption difference: +17%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 Type S 1.4i-VTEC MT | Petrol | 5.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+14% |
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 Type S 1.4i-VTEC AT | Petrol | 5.7 l/100km | |
1.8Honda Civic 2008 Type S 1.8i-VTEC MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+17% |
1.8Honda Civic 2008 Type S 1.8i-VTEC AT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+26% |
2.0Honda Civic 2008 Type R 2.0i-VTEC MT | Petrol | 9.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+3% |
2.2Honda Civic 2008 Type S 2.2i-CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km+17% |
2007
Honda Civic 2007 3 door hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Honda Civic 2007 1.3 1.4 MT | 5.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+10% |
1.8Honda Civic 2007 1.8 MT | 7.8 l/100km | |
1.8Honda Civic 2007 1.8 AT | 8.1 l/100km | |
2.0Honda Civic 2007 Type R 2.0 MT | 9.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+10% |
2.2Honda Civic 2007 2.2 TD MT | 6.2 l/100km |
2006
Honda Civic 2006 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Honda Civic 2008 1.3 1.6 MT | 5.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+14% |
1.6Honda Civic 2011 1.6 MT | 6.7 l/100km | |
1.6Honda Civic 2011 1.6 AT | 7.1 l/100km | |
1.7Honda Civic 2006 1.7 MT | 9.8 l/100km | |
1.8Honda Civic 2006 1.8 MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+10% |
1.8Honda Civic 2006 1.8 AT | 7.0 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+16% |
2005
Honda Civic 2005 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +23% Average real diesel consumption difference: +22%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 2005 1.3 1.4i DSi MT | Petrol | 5.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+12% |
1.4Honda Civic 2005 1.3 1.4i DSi AT | Petrol | 5.7 l/100km | |
1.8Honda Civic 2005 1.8i-VTEC MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+20% |
1.8Honda Civic 2005 1.8i-VTEC AT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+37% |
2.2Honda Civic 2005 2.2i-CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+22% |
2003
Honda Civic 2003 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8% Average real diesel consumption difference: +16%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 2003 1.4i MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+5% |
1.4Honda Civic 2003 1.4i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | |
1.6Honda Civic 2003 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+6% |
1.6Honda Civic 2003 1.6i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+10% |
1.7Honda Civic 2003 1.7 CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+16% |
2.0Honda Civic 2004 2.0 MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+13% |
2003
Honda Civic 2003 3 door hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7% Average real diesel consumption difference: +16%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 2003 1.4i MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+5% |
1.4Honda Civic 2003 1.4i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | |
1.6Honda Civic 2003 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+6% |
1.6Honda Civic 2003 1.6i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+13% |
1.7Honda Civic 2003 1.7 CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+16% |
2.0Honda Civic 2003 2.0i Type-R MT | Petrol | 8.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+3% |
2003
Honda Civic 2003 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.7Honda Civic 2003 Coupe 1.7i 120 Hp 120 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km-1% |
1.7Honda Civic 2003 Coupe 1.7i 125 Hp 125 HP MT | 6.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+12% |
1.7Honda Civic 2003 Coupe 1.7i 125 Hp Automatic 125 HP AT | 7.3 l/100km |
2001
Honda Civic 2001 3 door hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11% Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 2001 1.4i MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+8% |
1.4Honda Civic 2001 1.4i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+18% |
1.6Honda Civic 2001 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+7% |
1.6Honda Civic 2001 1.6i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+18% |
1.7Honda Civic 2002 1.7 CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+8% |
2.0Honda Civic 2001 2.0i Type-R MT | Petrol | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
2001
Honda Civic 2001 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11% Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 2001 1.4i MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+8% |
1.4Honda Civic 2001 1.4i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | |
1.6Honda Civic 2001 1.6i MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+7% |
1.6Honda Civic 2001 1.6i AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+18% |
1.7Honda Civic 2002 1.7 CTDi MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+8% |
2001
Honda Civic 2001 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 2001 1.4 MT | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+6% |
1.6Honda Civic 2001 1.6 MT | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+4% |
1.6Honda Civic 2001 1.6 AT | 7.5 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+9% |
1.7Honda Civic 2001 1.7 MT | 6.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+10% |
2001
Honda Civic 2001 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.7Honda Civic 2001 Coupe 1.7i 120 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km-1% |
1.7Honda Civic 2001 Coupe 1.7i 120 HP AT | 6.8 l/100km | |
1.7Honda Civic 2001 Coupe 1.7i 125 HP MT | 6.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+6% |
1998
Honda Civic 1998 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 1998 Aero Deck 1.4i MT | 7.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+3% |
1.5Honda Civic 1998 Aero Deck 1.5i VTEC-E MT | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+1% |
1.6Honda Civic 1999 Aero Deck 1.6i MT | 7.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km-3% |
1.8Honda Civic 1998 Aero Deck 1.8 VTi MT | 8.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km+3% |
2.0Honda Civic 1998 Aero Deck 2.0D MT | 5.3 l/100km |
1997
Honda Civic 1997 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 1997 1.4i MT | 7.5 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km+4% |
1.4Honda Civic 1997 1.4i AT | 8.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km-3% |
1.5Honda Civic 1997 1.5i VTEC-E MT | 6.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+2% |
1.6Honda Civic 1997 1.6i AT | 9.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km-5% |
1.6Honda Civic 2000 1.6i MT | 7.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km-5% |
1.8Honda Civic 1997 1.8i VTi MT | 8.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km-2% |
2.0Honda Civic 1997 2.0D MT | 5.3 l/100km |
1996
Honda Civic 1996 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Honda Civic 1996 Coupe 1.6i MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+7% |
1.6Honda Civic 1996 Coupe 1.6i AT | 8.1 l/100km |
1996
Honda Civic 1996 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +3%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 1996 1.4i MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+1% |
1.4Honda Civic 1996 1.4i AT | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km0% |
1.5Honda Civic 1996 1.5i LS VTEC-E MT | 6.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km0% |
1.5Honda Civic 1996 1.5i LS VTEC-E AT | 7.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+15% |
1.6Honda Civic 1996 1.6 VTi MT | 8.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km0% |
1995
Honda Civic 1995 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +6%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Honda Civic versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Honda Civic 1995 1.4i 75 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km0% |
1.4Honda Civic 1995 1.4i 90 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+1% |
1.4Honda Civic 1995 1.4i 90 HP AT | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km-1% |
1.5Honda Civic 1995 1.5i VTEC-E MT | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+5% |
1.5Honda Civic 1995 1.5i VTEC-E AT | 7.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+15% |
1.6Honda Civic 1995 1.6i ES AT | 7.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+20% |
1.6Honda Civic 1995 1.6 VTi MT | 8.4 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+1% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.