Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare
Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared crossovers 8 - 14 years old

Most compared sedans 8 - 14 years old Most compared hatchbacks 8 - 14 years old Most compared estate cars 8 - 14 years old Most compared crossovers 8 - 14 years old Most compared cabrios 8 - 14 years old Most compared coupes 8 - 14 years old Most compared minivans 8 - 14 years old
Kia Sportage 2015 1.7 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.5
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • timing belt engine
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Audi Q5 2012 3.0 vs Audi Q5 2008 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 vs Kia Sportage 2014 1.6
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Renault Captur 2017 1.5 vs Peugeot 2008 2016 1.6
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
BMW X3 2017 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 2017 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • timing belt engine
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
full specification comparison
Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 2.4 vs Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Volvo XC60 2013 2.4 vs Audi Q5 2012 3.0
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 vs Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.6
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.8 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 1.4 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Audi Q5 2008 3.0 vs BMW X5 2010 3.0
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.5
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Audi Q5 2012 2.0 vs Audi Q3 2014 2.0
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 vs Toyota RAV4 2012 2.2
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Audi Q5 2012 2.0 vs BMW X3 2014 2.0
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 vs Mazda CX-5 2012 2.2
  • has 4x4 drive
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
Follow us on Facebook!
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv