Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared crossovers 8 - 14 years old

Most compared sedans 8 - 14 years old Most compared hatchbacks 8 - 14 years old Most compared estate cars 8 - 14 years old Most compared crossovers 8 - 14 years old Most compared cabrios 8 - 14 years old Most compared coupes 8 - 14 years old Most compared minivans 8 - 14 years old
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Touareg 2007 2.5 vs Volvo XC90 2006 2.4
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Kia Sorento 2009 2.2 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.2
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.2
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 vs Subaru Forester 2008 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Hyundai ix35 2009 2.0 vs BMW X1 2015 2.0
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Hyundai ix35 2013 1.7 vs Hyundai Tucson 2015 1.7
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2 vs Mercedes GLK 2012 2.1
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
full specification comparison
Kia Sportage 2015 1.7 vs Hyundai Tucson 2015 1.7
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more wide spread and longer produced engine
  • more power
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Volvo XC60 2013 2.0 vs Audi Q5 2012 2.0
  • more power
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Kia Sorento 2012 2.2 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2012 2.2
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Subaru Forester 2013 2.0 vs Subaru XV 2011 2.0
  • roomier boot
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Mercedes GLK 2008 3.0 vs Mercedes ML 2008 3.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Honda CR-V 2010 2.4 vs Honda CR-V 2007 2.4
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Volkswagen Touareg 2007 6.0 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 5.7
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower fuel consumption
    • higher ground clearance
    • roomier boot
    full specification comparison
    Volvo XC60 2008 2.4 vs Volvo XC90 2006 2.4
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • higher ground clearance
    • higher ratings in user reviews
    full specification comparison
    Nissan X-Trail 2014 2.0 vs Subaru Forester 2013 2.0
    • timing chain engine
    • lower price
    • timing belt engine
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    full specification comparison
    Subaru Forester 2011 2.0 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.5
    • timing belt engine
    • has 4x4 drive
    • fewer faults
    • timing chain engine
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    full specification comparison
    Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 1.9
    • timing chain engine
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • timing belt engine
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    full specification comparison
    Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.5
    • has 4x4 drive
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    full specification comparison
    Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
    Follow us on Facebook!
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv