Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 2-7 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared sedans 8 - 14 years old

Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 vs Toyota Corolla 2012 1.8
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Toyota Camry 2011 2.5 vs Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Honda Civic 2012 1.8 vs Toyota Corolla 2012 1.6
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better safety assist technologies
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Honda Civic 2008 1.8 vs Hyundai Elantra 2010 1.8
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more power
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Audi A6 2011 3.0 vs BMW 5 series 2010 3.0
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
full specification comparison
Toyota Corolla 2016 1.8 vs Mazda 3 2016 2.0
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 3.0 vs Audi A8 2010 3.0
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Hyundai i40 2011 1.7 vs Toyota Avensis 2012 2.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Audi A6 2011 3.0 vs Mercedes E class 2009 3.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Hyundai Elantra 2010 1.6 vs Hyundai i40 2011 1.6
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Audi A6 2011 3.0 vs BMW 5 series 2013 3.0
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Audi A4 2015 2.0 vs Mercedes C class 2013 2.1
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • timing chain engine
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Mazda 3 2011 1.6 vs Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
BMW 5 series 2016 3.0 vs Audi A6 2014 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Honda Civic 2012 1.8 vs Mazda 3 2013 2.0
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
full specification comparison
Peugeot 508 2014 1.6 vs Citroen C5 2012 1.6
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Jetta 2011 2.0 vs Volkswagen Passat 2010 2.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv