Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 8-14 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared sedans 2 - 7 years old

Volvo S90 2015 2.0 vs Skoda Superb 2015 2.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
full specification comparison
Mazda 3 2016 2.0 vs Hyundai Elantra 2016 2.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • more power
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Audi A3 2016 1.0 vs Audi A4 2015 1.4
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Volkswagen Passat 2014 1.4 vs Skoda Superb 2015 1.4
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Mercedes E class 2016 2.0 vs BMW 5 series 2016 2.0
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
Mazda 3 2016 2.0 vs Audi A3 2016 1.4
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Mazda 3 2016 1.6 vs Nissan Sentra 2016 1.8
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
full specification comparison
BMW 5 series 2016 3.0 vs Audi A8 2017 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
full specification comparison
BMW 5 series 2016 2.0 vs Volvo S90 2015 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
full specification comparison
Renault Megane 2016 1.6 vs Audi A3 2016 1.5
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
full specification comparison
Ford Focus 2018 1.0 vs Dacia Logan 2016 1.0
  • more power
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
full specification comparison
Mercedes E class 2016 2.0 vs Volvo S90 2015 2.0
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
full specification comparison
Citroen C4 2015 1.6 vs Mazda 3 2016 2.0
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
BMW 7 series 2015 3.0 vs Audi A8 2017 3.0
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
  • more power
full specification comparison
Renault Megane 2016 1.6 vs Dacia Logan 2016 1.0
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
full specification comparison
Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 vs Audi A4 2015 1.4
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
full specification comparison
Audi A3 2016 1.5 vs Ford Focus 2018 1.0
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
full specification comparison
Renault Megane 2016 1.5 vs Jaguar XE 2014 2.0
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
full specification comparison
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv