Car reviews Car technical data Find your car
Advanced car comparison tool - compare cars side by side. Compare technical parameters - performance, fuel consumption (official and real(!)), dimensions etc. as well as car prices, reliability, quality and safety ratings.
Choose first car to compare


Most compared cars 8-14 years oldMost compared cars more than 15 years old

Most compared coupes 2 - 7 years old

Most compared sedans 2 - 7 years old Most compared hatchbacks 2 - 7 years old Most compared estate cars 2 - 7 years old Most compared crossovers 2 - 7 years old Most compared cabrios 2 - 7 years old Most compared coupes 2 - 7 years old Most compared minivans 2 - 7 years old
BMW 4 series 2013 3.0 vs BMW 4 series 2017 3.0
  • lower price
    full specification comparison
    BMW 2 series 2017 2.0 vs BMW 4 series 2017 2.0
      • roomier boot
      full specification comparison
      Mercedes E class 2016 2.0 vs Dodge Charger 2015 3.6
        • has 4x4 drive
        • higher ground clearance
        • longer expected engine lifespan
        full specification comparison
        Mercedes CLA 2016 2.1 vs BMW 4 series 2017 2.0
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        • roomier boot
        • lower price
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        full specification comparison
        Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 1.4 vs Mercedes CLA 2016 1.6
        • timing belt engine
        • more wide spread and longer produced engine
        • timing chain engine
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        full specification comparison
        Jaguar F-Type 2013 5.0 vs BMW 4 series 2017 2.0
        • more power
        • more dynamic
        • longer expected engine lifespan
        • lower fuel consumption
        • more full fuel tank mileage
        • roomier boot
        full specification comparison
        Mercedes E class 2016 2.0 vs BMW 4 series 2017 3.0
          • more power
          • more dynamic
          • has 4x4 drive
          full specification comparison
          BMW 2 series 2017 2.0 vs Audi TT 2014 2.0
          • lower fuel consumption
          • more full fuel tank mileage
          • roomier boot
          • more power
          • more dynamic
          • has 4x4 drive
          full specification comparison
          BMW 4 series 2017 3.0 vs Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0
          • more dynamic
          • lower fuel consumption
          • more full fuel tank mileage
          • longer expected engine lifespan
          • better manoeuvrability
          full specification comparison
          Mercedes E class 2016 3.0 vs Mercedes CLA 2016 1.6
          • more power
          • more dynamic
          • has 4x4 drive
          • roomier boot
          • better manoeuvrability
          • lower price
          full specification comparison
          Mercedes CLS 2014 3.5 vs Dodge Charger 2015 3.6
          • more power
          • lower fuel consumption
          • more full fuel tank mileage
          • higher ground clearance
          • longer expected engine lifespan
          • more wide spread and longer produced engine
          full specification comparison
          Porsche Panamera 2016 2.9 vs Mercedes E class 2016 3.0
          • higher ground clearance
          • roomier boot
          • more power
          • more dynamic
          • lower fuel consumption
          full specification comparison
          Mercedes CLS 2014 3.0 vs BMW 4 series 2013 3.0
          • has 4x4 drive
          • more wide spread and longer produced engine
          • roomier boot
          • more dynamic
          • higher ground clearance
          • lower price
          full specification comparison
          Audi TT 2014 2.0 vs BMW 4 series 2013 3.0
          • has 4x4 drive
          • more power
          • roomier boot
          • lower price
          full specification comparison
          BMW 4 series 2013 2.0 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 2.0
          • has 4x4 drive
          • roomier boot
            full specification comparison
            Mercedes E class 2016 3.0 vs BMW 6 series 2015 3.0
            • has 4x4 drive
            • more wide spread and longer produced engine
            • lower price
            • longer expected engine lifespan
            • roomier boot
            full specification comparison
            Audi TT 2014 2.0 vs BMW 2 series 2013 3.0
            • lower fuel consumption
            • more full fuel tank mileage
            • fewer faults
            • more power
            • more dynamic
            • roomier boot
            full specification comparison
            BMW 2 series 2013 2.0 vs BMW 4 series 2013 2.0
            • more dynamic
            • higher ground clearance
            • roomier boot
            full specification comparison
            Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 vs Lexus RC 2014 3.5
            • more power
            • more dynamic
            • lower fuel consumption
            • higher ground clearance
            • roomier boot
            full specification comparison
            BMW 6 series 2015 3.0 vs BMW 8 series 2018 3.0
            • roomier boot
            • lower price
            • more dynamic
            • lower fuel consumption
            • more full fuel tank mileage
            full specification comparison
            Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
            Follow us on Facebook!
            Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv