Real Citroen C5 fuel consumption
Citroen C5 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 9% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Citroen C5 produced from 2000 to 2017.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2012
Citroen C5 2012 wagon
Average real diesel consumption difference: +15%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 Tourer 1.6 VTi 120 HP MT | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 Tourer 1.6 VTi 120 HP AT | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 Tourer 1.6 THP 150 HP MT | 7.2 l/100km | |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 Tourer 1.6 THP 150 HP AT | 7.7 l/100km | |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 e-HDI AT | 4.5 l/100km | |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 HDi MT | 5.0 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 Tourer 2.0 Hdi 138 HP AT | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 2.0 HDi 140 HP MT | 5.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 2.0 BlueHDi 150 HP MT | 4.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 2.0 HDi 163 HP MT | 5.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 2.0 HDi 163 HP AT | 6.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 2.0 BlueHDi 180 HP AT | 4.4 l/100km | |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2012 Tourer 2.2 Hdi AT | 6.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+15% |
2012
Citroen C5 2012 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +18% Average real diesel consumption difference: +17%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 VTi 120 HP MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 THP 156 HP MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+12% |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 THP 156 HP AT | Petrol | 7.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+23% |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 HDi MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+16% |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2012 1.6 e-HDi AT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2012 2.0 HDi MT | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+17% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2012 2.2 HDi AT | Diesel | 5.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+17% |
2008
Citroen C5 2008 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +4% Average real diesel consumption difference: +3%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 1.6 HDiF MT | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km0% |
| 1.7Citroen C5 2008 1.7 Tourer 1.8i MT | Petrol | 8.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+4% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 2.0i MT | Petrol | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 2.0i AT | Petrol | 9.0 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 2.0 HDiF MT | Diesel | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+7% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 2.0 HDiF AT | Diesel | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+4% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 2.2 HDiF MT | Diesel | 6.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km0% |
| 2.7Citroen C5 2008 Tourer 2.7 HDiF AT | Diesel | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 2.9Citroen C5 2008 2.9 Tourer 3.0i V6 AT | Petrol | 10.6 l/100km |
2008
Citroen C5 2008 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +6% Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Citroen C5 2008 1.6 HDiF MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km+2% |
| 1.7Citroen C5 2008 1.7 1.8i MT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 2.0i MT | Petrol | 8.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 2.0i AT | Petrol | 8.9 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 2.0 HDiF MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+8% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2008 2.0 HDiF AT | Diesel | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+6% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2008 2.2 HDiF MT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+6% |
| 2.7Citroen C5 2008 2.7 HDiF AT | Diesel | 8.4 l/100km | |
| 2.9Citroen C5 2008 2.9 3.0i V6 AT | Petrol | 10.5 l/100km |
2004
Citroen C5 2004 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10% Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Citroen C5 2004 1.6 HDiF 16V 110 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+11% |
| 1.6Citroen C5 2006 1.6 HDiF 16V 110 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+7% |
| 1.7Citroen C5 2004 1.7 1.8 16V MT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+3% |
| 1.8Citroen C5 2005 1.8 16V 125 HP MT | Petrol | 7.6 l/100km | |
| 1.8Citroen C5 2006 1.8 16V 125 HP MT | Petrol | 7.6 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2004 2.0 16V 143 HP MT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+15% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2004 2.0 16V 143 HP AT | Petrol | 8.6 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+16% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2006 2.0 16V 143 HP MT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km+16% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2006 2.0 16V 143 HP AT | Petrol | 8.6 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2004 2.0 HDi 16V 138 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+8% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2005 2.0 HDiF 16V 138 HP AT | Diesel | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+8% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2006 2.0 HDiF 16V 138 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km+7% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2006 2.0 HDiF 16V 138 HP AT | Diesel | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+8% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2004 2.2 HDiF 16V AT | Diesel | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+6% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2006 2.2 HDiF 16V MT | Diesel | 6.1 l/100km | |
| 2.9Citroen C5 2004 2.9 3.0 V6 24V AT | Petrol | 10.0 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km-1% |
2004
Citroen C5 2004 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10% Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
2001
Citroen C5 2001 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +5% Average real diesel consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
2000
Citroen C5 2000 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +6% Average real diesel consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Citroen C5 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7Citroen C5 2000 1.7 1.8 16V 117 HP MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+6% |
| 1.7Citroen C5 2000 1.7 1.8 16V 117 HP AT | Petrol | 8.4 l/100km | |
| 1.7Citroen C5 2003 1.7 1.8 16V 117 HP MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+5% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2000 2.0 16V 138 HP MT | Petrol | 8.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+5% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2000 2.0 16V 138 HP AT | Petrol | 8.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+9% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2003 2.0 16V 138 HP AT | Petrol | 8.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+5% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2000 2.0 HPi 143 HP MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2001 2.0 HDi 90 HP MT | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+11% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2003 2.0 HDi 90 HP MT | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+14% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2000 2.0 HDi 110 HP MT | Diesel | 5.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+13% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2000 2.0 HDi 110 HP AT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0Citroen C5 2000 2.0 HDi 110 HP AT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+6% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2000 2.2 HDi 16V 136 HP MT | Diesel | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+6% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2000 2.2 HDi 16V 136 HP AT | Diesel | 7.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km+11% |
| 2.2Citroen C5 2003 2.2 HDi 16V 136 HP MT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+6% |
| 2.9Citroen C5 2000 2.9 3.0 V6 MT | Petrol | 9.6 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+13% |
| 2.9Citroen C5 2000 2.9 3.0 V6 AT | Petrol | 10.2 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km+2% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.
