Real Toyota Land Cruiser fuel consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 11% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 4% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Toyota Land Cruiser produced from 1985 to 2021. For Toyota Land Cruiser produced up to 2003 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +11%, while for those produced after 2003 it is on average +24%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017
Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 150
Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.7 MT 4x4 | 11.6 l/100km | |
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.7 AT 4x4 | 11.7 l/100km | |
| 2.8Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.8 TD MT 4x4 | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+14% |
| 2.8Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.8 TD AT 4x4 | 7.4 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km+32% |
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 4.0 AT 4x4 | 10.8 l/100km |
2013
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150
Average real diesel consumption difference: +32%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.7 MT 4x4 | 11.6 l/100km | |
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.7 Automatic AT 4x4 | 12.5 l/100km | |
| 2.8Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 Prado 2.8 TD AT 4x4 | 7.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+20% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 3.0 D-4D MT 4x4 | 8.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+24% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 3.0 D-4D Automatic AT 4x4 | 8.1 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km+51% |
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 4.0 AT 4x4 | 10.8 l/100km |
2009
Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 Prado 150
Average real diesel consumption difference: +46%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 150 Prado 3.0 TD AT 4x4 | 8.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km+46% |
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 150 Prado 4.0 AT 4x4 | 10.8 l/100km |
2002
Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 Prado 120
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 3.0 D-4D 163 HP MT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.5 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+5% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 3.0 D-4D 163 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 10.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km+1% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 D-4D 173 HP MT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.2 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+22% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 D-4D 173 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.0 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+24% |
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2003 4.0 V6 VVT-i 249 HP AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.6 l/100km | |
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 4.0 V6 VVT-i 249 HP AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.5 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km-2% |
2002
Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100
Average real diesel consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 4.2 TDi MT 4x4 | 11.1 l/100km | |
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 4.2 TDi AT 4x4 | 12.6 l/100km | 13.8 l/100km+10% |
| 4.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 4.7 V8 32v AT 4x4 | 16.4 l/100km |
1998
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100
Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 MT 4x4 | 13.5 l/100km | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 AT 4x4 | 14.1 l/100km | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.0 TD 125 HP MT 4x4 | 11.1 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km+4% |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.0 TD 125 HP AT 4x4 | 12.0 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km-1% |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2001 90 Wagon 3.0 D4-D 163 HP MT 4x4 | 9.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+16% |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2001 90 Wagon 3.0 D4-D 163 HP AT 4x4 | 10.4 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km+7% |
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 4.2 TD MT 4x4 | 11.1 l/100km | 12.3 l/100km+11% |
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 4.2 TD AT 4x4 | 12.6 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km+12% |
| 4.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 4.7 V8 AT 4x4 | 16.6 l/100km |
1996
Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 Prado 90
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 2.7 16V (3 dr) 152 HP MT 4x4 | 13.0 l/100km | |
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 2.7 16V 4x4 152 HP MT | 13.0 l/100km | |
| 2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 2.7 16V Automatic 4x4 152 HP AT | 13.0 l/100km | |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.0 TD 4x4 125 HP MT | 11.1 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+1% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.0 TD Automatic 4x4 125 HP AT | 12.0 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km-1% |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2000 3.0 D-4D (3 dr) 163 HP MT 4x4 | 10.4 l/100km | |
| 3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2000 3.0 D-4D (5 dr) 163 HP MT 4x4 | 9.5 l/100km | |
| 3.4Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 4x4 MT | 13.5 l/100km | |
| 3.4Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 Automatic 4x4 AT | 14.1 l/100km | 15.4 l/100km+9% |
1990
Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 80
Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 4.0 (FJ80) MT 4x4 | 15.6 l/100km | |
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 Customwagon 4.2 D 131 HP MT 4x4 | 14.2 l/100km | |
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 Customwagon 4.2 TD 160 Hp 160 HP MT 4x4 | 12.4 l/100km | |
| 4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 Customwagon 4.2 TD 170 Hp 170 HP MT 4x4 | 11.2 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km+13% |
| 4.5Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 Customwagon 4.5i 24V 205 HP AT 4x4 | 14.0 l/100km | |
| 4.5Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 4.5 24V 4WD 215 HP AT | 17.8 l/100km |
1985
Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 70
Average real diesel consumption difference: +16%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Land Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 4.0 D 103 HP MT 4x4 | 12.9 l/100km | |
| 4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 4.0 TD 136 HP MT 4x4 | 10.5 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km+16% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.