Real Toyota Land Cruiser fuel consumption

Toyota Land Cruiser real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 10% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 3% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Toyota Land Cruiser produced from 1985 to 2021. For Toyota Land Cruiser produced up to 2003 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +11%, while for those produced after 2003 it is on average +24%.

See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017 Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 150 Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.7 MT 4x4 11.6 l/100km
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.7 AT 4x4 11.7 l/100km
2.8Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.8 TD MT 4x4 7.4 l/100km 8.4 l/100km+14%
2.8Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 2.8 TD AT 4x4 7.4 l/100km 9.8 l/100km+32%
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 Prado 4.0 AT 4x4 10.8 l/100km
2013 Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150 Average real diesel consumption difference: +32%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.7 MT 4x4 11.6 l/100km
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.7 Automatic AT 4x4 12.5 l/100km
2.8Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 Prado 2.8 TD AT 4x4 7.4 l/100km 9.0 l/100km+22%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 3.0 D-4D MT 4x4 8.2 l/100km 10.2 l/100km+24%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 3.0 D-4D Automatic AT 4x4 8.1 l/100km 12.1 l/100km+49%
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 4.0 AT 4x4 10.8 l/100km
2009 Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 Prado 150 Average real diesel consumption difference: +46%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 150 Prado 3.0 TD AT 4x4 8.1 l/100km 11.8 l/100km+46%
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 150 Prado 4.0 AT 4x4 10.8 l/100km
2002 Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 Prado 120 Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
ModificationFuelClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 3.0 D-4D 163 HP MT 4x4 Diesel 9.5 l/100km 10.0 l/100km+5%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 3.0 D-4D 163 HP AT 4x4 Diesel 10.4 l/100km 10.5 l/100km+1%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 D-4D 173 HP MT 4x4 Diesel 9.2 l/100km 11.2 l/100km+22%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 D-4D 173 HP AT 4x4 Diesel 9.0 l/100km 11.2 l/100km+24%
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2003 4.0 V6 VVT-i 249 HP AT 4x4 Petrol 13.6 l/100km
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 4.0 V6 VVT-i 249 HP AT 4x4 Petrol 13.5 l/100km 13.2 l/100km-2%
2002 Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 Average real diesel consumption difference: +10%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 4.2 TDi MT 4x4 11.1 l/100km
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 4.2 TDi AT 4x4 12.6 l/100km 13.8 l/100km+10%
4.7Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 100 4.7 V8 32v AT 4x4 16.4 l/100km
1998 Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 MT 4x4 13.5 l/100km
Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 AT 4x4 14.1 l/100km
Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.0 TD 125 HP MT 4x4 11.1 l/100km 11.5 l/100km+4%
Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 90 Wagon 3.0 TD 125 HP AT 4x4 12.0 l/100km 11.9 l/100km-1%
Toyota Land Cruiser 2001 90 Wagon 3.0 D4-D 163 HP MT 4x4 9.5 l/100km 11.1 l/100km+17%
Toyota Land Cruiser 2001 90 Wagon 3.0 D4-D 163 HP AT 4x4 10.4 l/100km 11.1 l/100km+7%
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 4.2 TD MT 4x4 11.1 l/100km 12.3 l/100km+11%
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 4.2 TD AT 4x4 12.6 l/100km 14.1 l/100km+12%
4.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 100 4.7 V8 AT 4x4 16.6 l/100km
1996 Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 Prado 90 Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 2.7 16V (3 dr) 152 HP MT 4x4 13.0 l/100km
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 2.7 16V 4x4 152 HP MT 13.0 l/100km
2.7Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 2.7 16V Automatic 4x4 152 HP AT 13.0 l/100km
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.0 TD 4x4 125 HP MT 11.1 l/100km 11.2 l/100km+1%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.0 TD Automatic 4x4 125 HP AT 12.0 l/100km 11.9 l/100km-1%
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2000 3.0 D-4D (3 dr) 163 HP MT 4x4 10.4 l/100km
3.0Toyota Land Cruiser 2000 3.0 D-4D (5 dr) 163 HP MT 4x4 9.5 l/100km
3.4Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 4x4 MT 13.5 l/100km
3.4Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 90 Wagon 3.4 V6 Automatic 4x4 AT 14.1 l/100km 15.2 l/100km+8%
1990 Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 80 Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 4.0 (FJ80) MT 4x4 15.6 l/100km
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 Customwagon 4.2 D 131 HP MT 4x4 14.2 l/100km
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 Customwagon 4.2 TD 160 Hp 160 HP MT 4x4 12.4 l/100km
4.2Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 Customwagon 4.2 TD 170 Hp 170 HP MT 4x4 11.2 l/100km 12.7 l/100km+13%
4.5Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 Customwagon 4.5i 24V 205 HP AT 4x4 14.0 l/100km
4.5Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 4.5 24V 4WD 215 HP AT 17.8 l/100km
1985 Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 70 Average real diesel consumption difference: +16%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 4.0 D 103 HP MT 4x4 12.9 l/100km
4.0Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 4.0 TD 136 HP MT 4x4 10.5 l/100km 12.2 l/100km+16%

Real fuel consumption of other carmakers

Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv