Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150
Its my second Lancruiser. It is very reliable car! I've never stuck with it somewhere. Relatively little repairs - basically lamp replacement and maintenance. Very roomy.
read all Toyota Land Cruiser reviews
This Toyota is available with two petrol engines with displacement from 2.7 to 4.0 litres and power of from 163 to 282 horsepower un one diesel engine with displacement 2.8 litres and power of 177 HP.
The car is available with both manual (1 version), as well as automatic (3 versions) gearbox.
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150 average fuel consumption in combined cycle for petrol engine is from 10.8 to 12.5 litres per 100km, but for diesel engine - approximately 7.4 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150 petrol engine version is Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 4.0, consuming 10.8 litres per 100km.
According to user reviews, Toyota Land Cruiser real-world fuel consumption is on average about approximately for 24 percents higher as the manufacturer's claimed fuel economy. For a more detailed actual fuel economy of each model, select a specific Toyota Land Cruiser modification.
The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 9.2 seconds has Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 4.0 version, conversely the tardiest one is Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.7 reaching this speed only in 13.8 seconds. The maximum top speed is 180 km/h for the petrol 282 hp version (Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 4.0).
Lenght of Toyota Land Cruiser is 478 cm, it is decent size car. For comparison - Toyota Land Cruiser is about 3 cm longer than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but 3 cm shorter than Volvo XC90. Toyota Land Cruiser gross weight is from 2850 to 2990 kg (depending on modification), this car is about 6 percent heavier than the average for this age and class of vehicles. Toyota Land Cruiser trunk space is 621 litres.
This Toyota is quite costly - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 33 000 €. Users calculated Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 cost of ownership for this generation, got average 5500 € cost per year and 0.65 € cost per one kilometer. Fuel costs were estimated at around 44%, while repair and maintenance costs - around 20% from total. We have an excellent car cost calculator, calculate ownership costs of Toyota Land Cruiser for your situation and driving habits here! Below you will find more detailed information about Toyota Land Cruiser prices and costs.
Toyota Land Cruiser modifications
Modification | Engine | Power | Consumption | Gearbox |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.7 4x4
Only version with manual transmission |
2.7 Petrol | 163 HP | 11.6 l/100km | Manual (5) |
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.7 4x4 | 2.7 Petrol | 163 HP | 12.5 l/100km | Automatic (4) |
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 4.0 4x4
Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 9.2 seconds |
4.0 Petrol | 282 HP | 10.8 l/100km | Automatic (5) |
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 2.8 TD 4x4 | 2.8 Diesel | 177 HP | 7.4 l/100km | Automatic (6) |
Toyota Land Cruiser prices
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 - 2017 crossover price in Latvia is from 24000 € to 45000 €.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Toyota Land Cruiser price is very high - Toyota Land Cruiser is approximately for 53 percents more expensive then average crossovers of this age (compare crossovers 2013 - 2017 prices). Toyota Land Cruiser high price can be explained by its quality above average (see below), therefore this Toyota could be reasonable purchase in long term perspective.
Year | Lowest | Average | Highest | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2016 price | 33 000 € | 38 500 € | 45 000 € | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 price | 26 000 € | 33 000 € | 39 000 € | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 2014 price | 25 000 € | 33 000 € | 39 000 € | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 price | 24 000 € | 27 500 € | 31 500 € |
Toyota Land Cruiser total costs of ownership
How much really costs to own Toyota Land Cruiser? Users calculated Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 cost of ownership for this generation, got average 5500 € cost per year and 0.65 € cost per one kilometer.
To calculate the Toyota Land Cruiser total running costs, including the purchase, insurance, maintenance costs as well as taxes and other costs, click year of production
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser 2014 Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 Toyota Land Cruiser 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150 features (options)
Percentage of Toyota Land Cruiser with corresponding feature (option)
90% Metallic paint
73% Tire pressure control
69% Rain sensor
63% Conditioning
56% Roof bars (railings)
50% Heated seats
50% Rear-view camera
48% Cruise control
48% Xenon headlights
48% Leather upholstery
46% Rear parking sensors
44% Front parking sensors
44% Electrically adjustable seats
42% Adjustable steering wheel
35% Navigation
27% Distance control
23% Electrically adjustable steering wheel
23% Bi-xenon lights
17% Panoramic 360-degree camera
15% Heated steering wheel
15% Auxiliary heating
13% Dimming mirrors
13%
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 Prado 150 photo images
Similar cars to Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
Cars similar and most compared to Toyota Land Cruiser 2013. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.
- automatic transmission only
- lower price
- lower price
- also available in 2WD
- roomier boot
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
- lower price
- roomier boot
- only diesel engines available
- lower price
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
- roomier boot
- lower price
- lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Toyota Land Cruiser reviews
Total 9 Toyota Land Cruiser owner reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Toyota Land Cruiser.
Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 155`000 kilometers (7 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 500 € (~ 71 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Its my second Lancruiser. It is very reliable car! I've never stuck with it somewhere. Relatively little repairs - basically lamp replacement and maintenance. Very roomy.
Cons: A little too big. There is no quick acceleration.
Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 0 years) | Owned for: | 187`000 kilometers (10 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.3 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 15 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The car to which you can rely on.
Cons: The brake cylinders can jam.
Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 1 year) | Owned for: | 225`000 kilometers (7 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.6 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 360`000 kilometers (3 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 2 years |
---|
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 55`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 150 € (~ 75 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (1 year) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Good comfort and trafficability.
Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 15 years) | Owned for: | 250`000 kilometers (10 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 14.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 1745 € (~ 174 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Purchase year: | 2009 (age of car 23 years) | Owned for: | 200`000 kilometers (7 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 1100 € (~ 157 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The best off-road car
Cons: Rusting