Real Nissan 200 SX fuel consumption
Nissan 200 SX real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 17% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Nissan 200 SX produced from 1988 to 2000. For Nissan 200 SX produced up to 1994 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +10%, while for those produced after 1994 it is on average +21%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
1997
Nissan 200 SX 1997
Average real petrol consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Nissan 200 SX versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Nissan 200 SX 1997 2.0 Turbo MT | 8.8 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+23% |
| 2.0Nissan 200 SX 1997 2.0 Turbo AT | 8.9 l/100km |
1994
Nissan 200 SX 1994
Average real petrol consumption difference: +19%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Nissan 200 SX versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Nissan 200 SX 1994 2.0 Turbo MT | 8.8 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Nissan 200 SX 1994 2.0 Turbo AT | 9.3 l/100km |
1988
Nissan 200 SX 1988
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Nissan 200 SX versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8Nissan 200 SX 1988 1.8 Turbo MT | 9.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+10% |
| 1.8Nissan 200 SX 1988 1.8 Turbo AT | 9.1 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.