Real Ford Tourneo fuel consumption
Ford Tourneo real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 21% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 25% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 17% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Ford Tourneo produced from 2002 to 2023. For Ford Tourneo produced up to 2013 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +12%, while for those produced after 2013 it is on average +22%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2014
Ford Tourneo 2014
Average real petrol consumption difference: +25% Average real diesel consumption difference: +22%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Tourneo versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0Ford Tourneo 2014 Connect 1.0 EcoBoost MT | Petrol | 5.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+27% |
| 1.6Ford Tourneo 2014 Connect 1.6 EcoBoost AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km+23% |
| 1.6Ford Tourneo 2014 Connect 1.6 TDCi MT | Diesel | 4.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km+22% |
2002
Ford Tourneo 2002
Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Tourneo versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8Ford Tourneo 2002 Connect LWB 1.8 TDCi 90 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+9% |
| 1.8Ford Tourneo 2002 Connect SWB 1.8 TDCi 90 HP MT | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+9% |
| 1.8Ford Tourneo 2002 Connect LWB 1.8 TDCi 110 HP MT | 6.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+15% |
| 1.8Ford Tourneo 2002 Connect SWB 1.8 TDCi 110 HP MT | 6.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+15% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.