Real Ford Ranger fuel consumption
Ford Ranger real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 14% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Ford Ranger produced from 2006 to 2020. For Ford Ranger produced up to 2013 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +8%, while for those produced after 2013 it is on average +21%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2015
Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab
Average real diesel consumption difference: +24%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Ranger versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 2.2 TDCi 4x4 130 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 2.2 TDCi 160 HP MT | 6.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+29% |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 2.2 TDCi 160 HP AT | 7.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+28% |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 2.2 TDCi 4x4 160 HP MT | 7.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+25% |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 2.2 TDCi 4x4 160 HP AT | 8.0 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+20% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 3.2 TDCi 200 HP MT | 8.2 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+21% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 3.2 TDCi 200 HP AT | 8.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+29% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 3.2 TDCi 4x4 200 HP MT | 8.3 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+19% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Double Cab 3.2 TDCi 4x4 200 HP AT | 8.9 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+24% |
2015
Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab
Average real diesel consumption difference: +24%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Ranger versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab 2.2 TDCi 4x4 130 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab 2.2 TDCi 4x4 160 HP MT | 7.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+25% |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab 2.2 TDCi 4x4 160 HP AT | 8.0 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+20% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab 3.2 TDCi 200 HP AT | 8.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+29% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab 3.2 TDCi 4x4 200 HP MT | 8.3 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+20% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2015 Regular Cab 3.2 TDCi 4x4 200 HP AT | 8.7 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+26% |
2012
Ford Ranger 2012 Double Cab
Average real diesel consumption difference: +15%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Ranger versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2012 Double Cab 2.2 MT 4x4 | 8.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+13% |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2012 Double Cab 2.2 TDCi AT 4x4 | 9.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km+14% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2012 Double Cab 3.2 TDCi MT 4x4 | 9.5 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km+6% |
| 3.2Ford Ranger 2012 Double Cab 3.2 TDCi AT 4x4 | 10.4 l/100km | 13.0 l/100km+25% |
2011
Ford Ranger 2011 Regular Cab
Average real diesel consumption difference: +15%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Ranger versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2011 2.2 TDCi 4x4 MT | 8.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+16% |
| 2.2Ford Ranger 2011 2.2 TDCi Automatic 4x4 AT | 9.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km+14% |
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2011 2.5 MT 4x4 | 10.8 l/100km | |
| 3.1Ford Ranger 2011 3.2 TDCi 4x4 MT | 9.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+7% |
| 3.1Ford Ranger 2011 3.2 TDCi Automatic 4x4 AT | 10.4 l/100km | 13.0 l/100km+25% |
2006
Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab
Average real diesel consumption difference: +6%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Ranger versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab 2.5 TDCi RWD 143 HP MT | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2006 XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD 143 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2010 Double Cab 2.5 TDi 143 HP AT 4x4 | 10.4 l/100km | |
| 3.0Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4 AT | 10.2 l/100km |
2006
Ford Ranger 2006 Regular Cab
Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Ranger versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 2.5 TDCi 143 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2006 XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD 143 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| 2.5Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 2.5 TDCi 4x4 143 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| 3.0Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 156 HP AT | 10.2 l/100km | |
| 3.0Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4 156 HP AT | 10.2 l/100km | |
| 3.0Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 3.0 TDCi 156 HP MT | 9.2 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+3% |
| 3.0Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 3.0 TDCi 4x4 156 HP MT | 10.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+4% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.