Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab

This generation of Ford Ranger Double Cab has been produced from January, 2006 to January, 2012. We can provide information about 11 modifications of this generation. 2006 Ford Ranger is available with four wheel (4x4) drive (6 versions) and classical rear wheel drive (5 versions).

This Ford is available with two petrol engines with displacement from 2.3 to 4.0 litres and power of from 143 to 207 horsepower un two diesel engines with displacement from 2.5 to 3.0 litres and power of from 143 to 156 horsepower.
The car is available with both manual (4 versions), as well as automatic (7 versions) gearbox.

Ford Ranger 2006 photo image
Compare Ford Ranger to other cars

Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab average fuel consumption in combined cycle is from 8.9 to 10.4 litres per 100km. The most fuel efficient Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab version is Ford Ranger XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD, consuming 8.9 litres of diesel per 100km.
According to user reviews, Ford Ranger real-world fuel consumption is on average about approximately for 6 percents higher as the manufacturer's claimed fuel economy. For a more detailed actual fuel economy of each model, select a specific Ford Ranger modification.

Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab CO2 emissions is approximately 244 grams per kilometer. Ford Ranger version with the lowest CO2 emissions is Ford Ranger XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD, which produces 244 grams of CO2 per one kilometer.

The best acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h - 12 seconds has Ford Ranger XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD version, conversely the tardiest one is Ford Ranger Double Cab 2.5 TDi reaching this speed only in 14.7 seconds. The maximum top speed is 170 km/h for the 3.0 diesel 4-cylinder 156 hp version (Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi Automatic) and the 3.0 diesel 4-cylinder 156 hp version (Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4).

Lenght of Ford Ranger is 500 cm, it is large car. For comparison - Ford Ranger is about 3 cm longer than Land Rover Range Rover, but 8 cm shorter than Audi Q7. Ford Ranger gross weight is 3020 kg, which is approximately the same as the average for cars of this age and class. Ford Ranger trunk space is 1500 litres.

This Ford is relatively cheap - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 7500 €. Users calculated Ford Ranger 2006 cost of ownership for this generation, got average 4000 € cost per year and 0.26 € cost per one kilometer. Fuel costs were estimated at around 65%, while repair and maintenance costs - around 16% from total. We have an excellent car cost calculator, calculate ownership costs of Ford Ranger for your situation and driving habits here! Below you will find more detailed information about Ford Ranger prices and costs.

Ford Ranger modifications

Modification Engine Power Consumption Gearbox Drive type
Ford Ranger 2006 2.3 Jan 2006 — Dec 2010 2.3 Petrol 143 HP - Manual (5) Rear wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 2.3 Automatic Jan 2006 — Dec 2010 2.3 Petrol 143 HP - Automatic (5) Rear wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 2.3 4x4 Jan 2006 — Dec 2010 2.3 Petrol 143 HP - Manual (5) All wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 2.3 Automatic 4x4 Jan 2006 — Dec 2010 2.3 Petrol 143 HP - Automatic (5) All wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab 2.5 TDCi RWD 2.5 Diesel 143 HP - Manual (5) Rear wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD

Most dynamic version - 100 km/h in 12 seconds
Most fuel efficient diesel version

2.5 Diesel 143 HP 8.9 l/100km Manual (5) All wheel
Ford Ranger 2010 Double Cab 2.5 TDi 4x4 Jan 2010 — Jan 2012 2.5 Diesel 143 HP 10.4 l/100km Automatic (5) All wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic Jan 2006 — Dec 2010

Most powerfull diesel version (156 HP)

3.0 Diesel 156 HP - Automatic (5) Rear wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4 Jan 2006 — Dec 2010

Most powerfull diesel version (156 HP)

3.0 Diesel 156 HP 10.2 l/100km Automatic (5) All wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 4.0 V6 Automatic Jan 2006 — Dec 2010

Most powerfull petrol version (207 HP)

4.0 Petrol 207 HP - Automatic (5) Rear wheel
Ford Ranger 2006 4.0 V6 Automatic 4x4 Jan 2006 — Dec 2010

Most powerfull petrol version (207 HP)

4.0 Petrol 207 HP - Automatic (5) All wheel

Ford Ranger safety

During safety testing Ford Ranger has obtained 2 stars from five, which means quite low safety level.
Adults (driver and passenger) safety of Ford Ranger is evaluated with two stars, children safety - with three stars, and for pedestrian protection Ford Ranger got two stars.

Ford Ranger prices

Ford Ranger 2006 - 2012 crossover price in Latvia is from 3300 € to 12500 €.
Comparing to analogical vehicles Ford Ranger price is more below average - Ford Ranger is approximately for 27 percents cheaper then average crossovers of this age (compare crossovers 2006 - 2012 prices). Despite of relatively low price Ford Ranger quality is above average (see below), so this Ford can be a good buy.

YearLowestAverageHighestAvailability
Ford Ranger 2011 price 8000 € 10 500 € 12 500 €
Ford Ranger 2010 price 9500 € 10 500 € 12 500 €
Ford Ranger 2009 price 5500 € 7000 € 8000 €
Ford Ranger 2008 price 4500 € 7000 € 8500 €
Ford Ranger 2007 price 4300 € 5500 € 7000 €
Ford Ranger 2006 price 3300 € 4900 € 6000 €

Ford Ranger total costs of ownership

Ford Ranger mileage

Add review about Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab features (options)

Percentage of Ford Ranger with corresponding feature (option)

Conditioning
84%
Adjustable steering wheel
43%
Heated seats
32%
Metallic paint
32%
Roof bars (railings)
17%
Climate control
14%

Similar cars to Ford Ranger 2006

Cars similar and most compared to Ford Ranger 2006. Click on the image to view the car's specifications or on the "Compare..." link to compare cars.

Isuzu D-Max 2006 Isuzu D-Max 2006 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • only diesel engines available
Compare Ford Ranger 2006 vs Isuzu D-Max 2006
Mitsubishi L 200 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 2006 has
  • only diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
Compare Ford Ranger 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
Ford Ranger 2006 SUV Ford Ranger 2006 SUV has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Compare Ford Ranger 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006 SUV
Nissan Navara 2005 Nissan Navara 2005 has
  • higher safety
  • lower price
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Compare Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Chevrolet Blazer 1998 Chevrolet Blazer 1998 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
  • only petrol engines available
Compare Ford Ranger 2006 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Alfa Romeo Audi BMW Chevrolet Chrysler Citroen Dacia Dodge Fiat Ford Honda Hyundai Infiniti Isuzu Jaguar Jeep Kia Lada (VAZ) Land Rover Lexus Mazda Mercedes Mini Mitsubishi Moskvich Nissan Opel Peugeot Porsche Renault Rover SAAB Seat Skoda Smart Subaru Suzuki Toyota Volkswagen Volvo
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv