Honda CR-V 2004 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 2 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 38 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 127 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |