Real Volvo V40 fuel consumption

Volvo V40 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 20% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 16% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 24% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Volvo V40 produced from 1996 to 2021. For Volvo V40 produced up to 2009 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +7%, while for those produced after 2009 it is on average +36%.

Average difference between user reported and stated consumption

All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported

See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.

2016 Volvo V40 2016 hatchback Average real petrol consumption difference: +40% Average real diesel consumption difference: +49%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo V40 versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.5Volvo V40 2016 1.5 T2 122 HP AT	Petrol	5.4 l/100km	8.0 l/100km+48%
1.5Volvo V40 2016 1.5 T2 122 HP AT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	8.0 l/100km+45%
1.5Volvo V40 2016 1.5 T2 122 HP AT	Petrol		8.0 l/100km
1.5Volvo V40 2016 1.5 T3 152 HP AT	Petrol		7.6 l/100km
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T2 122 HP MT	Petrol	5.4 l/100km	7.1 l/100km+31%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T2 122 HP AT	Petrol	5.4 l/100km	8.0 l/100km+48%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T3 152 HP MT	Petrol	5.6 l/100km	6.9 l/100km+23%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T3 152 HP AT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	7.6 l/100km+38%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T4 190 HP MT	Petrol	5.6 l/100km	7.9 l/100km+41%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T4 190 HP AT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	7.7 l/100km+40%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 T5 245 HP AT	Petrol	5.9 l/100km	8.6 l/100km+46%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 D2 120 HP MT	Diesel	3.4 l/100km	4.9 l/100km+44%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 D2 120 HP AT	Diesel	3.7 l/100km	5.4 l/100km+46%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 D3 150 HP MT	Diesel	3.6 l/100km	5.4 l/100km+50%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 D3 150 HP AT	Diesel	3.9 l/100km	5.7 l/100km+46%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 D4 190 HP MT	Diesel	3.7 l/100km	5.7 l/100km+54%
2.0Volvo V40 2016 2.0 D4 190 HP AT	Diesel	4.0 l/100km	6.1 l/100km+53%

Do you own a Volvo V40? Please submit your fuel consumption!

2012 Volvo V40 2012 hatchback Average real petrol consumption difference: +23% Average real diesel consumption difference: +38%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo V40 versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6Volvo V40 2012 1.6 T3 150 HP MT	Petrol	5.4 l/100km	6.7 l/100km+24%
1.6Volvo V40 2012 1.6 T4 180 HP MT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	7.8 l/100km+42%
1.6Volvo V40 2012 1.6 T4 180 HP AT	Petrol	6.4 l/100km	8.1 l/100km+27%
1.6Volvo V40 2012 1.6 D2 MT	Diesel	3.6 l/100km	5.0 l/100km+39%
2.0Volvo V40 2015 2.0 T2 122 HP MT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	7.0 l/100km+27%
2.0Volvo V40 2015 2.0 T3 152 HP MT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	7.0 l/100km+27%
2.0Volvo V40 2013 2.0 T4 180 HP AT	Petrol	7.5 l/100km	8.1 l/100km+8%
2.0Volvo V40 2013 2.0 T5 213 HP AT	Petrol	7.5 l/100km
2.0Volvo V40 2014 2.0 T5 245 HP AT	Petrol	5.9 l/100km	8.2 l/100km+39%
2.0Volvo V40 2015 2.0 D2 120 HP MT	Diesel	3.2 l/100km	4.9 l/100km+53%
2.0Volvo V40 2015 2.0 D2 120 HP MT	Diesel	3.6 l/100km	4.9 l/100km+36%
2.0Volvo V40 2015 2.0 D2 120 HP AT	Diesel	3.8 l/100km	5.1 l/100km+34%
2.0Volvo V40 2012 2.0 D3 150 HP MT	Diesel	4.3 l/100km	5.6 l/100km+30%
2.0Volvo V40 2012 2.0 D3 150 HP AT	Diesel	5.2 l/100km	6.0 l/100km+15%
2.0Volvo V40 2012 2.0 D4 177 HP MT	Diesel	4.3 l/100km	5.9 l/100km+37%
2.0Volvo V40 2012 2.0 D4 177 HP AT	Diesel	5.2 l/100km	6.3 l/100km+21%
2.0Volvo V40 2014 2.0 D4 190 HP MT	Diesel	3.3 l/100km	5.4 l/100km+64%
2.0Volvo V40 2014 2.0 D4 190 HP MT	Diesel	3.8 l/100km	5.3 l/100km+39%
2.0Volvo V40 2014 2.0 D4 190 HP AT	Diesel	4.2 l/100km	6.2 l/100km+48%
2.5Volvo V40 2012 2.5 T5 AT	Petrol	9.0 l/100km	9.1 l/100km+1%

Do you own a Volvo V40? Please submit your fuel consumption!

2002 Volvo V40 2002 wagon Average real petrol consumption difference: +5% Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo V40 versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6Volvo V40 2002 1.6 MT	Petrol	7.7 l/100km	9.0 l/100km+17%
1.8Volvo V40 2002 1.8 Bi-Fuel 120 HP MT	Petrol	10.4 l/100km
1.8Volvo V40 2002 1.8 122 HP MT	Petrol	7.7 l/100km	8.2 l/100km+6%
1.8Volvo V40 2002 1.8 122 HP AT	Petrol	8.7 l/100km	9.5 l/100km+9%
1.8Volvo V40 2002 1.8i 125 HP MT	Petrol	6.9 l/100km	8.2 l/100km+19%
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 2.0 136 HP MT	Petrol	8.1 l/100km	8.7 l/100km+7%
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 2.0 136 HP AT	Petrol	8.9 l/100km
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 2.0 T 165 HP MT	Petrol	7.9 l/100km	8.1 l/100km+3%
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 2.0 T 165 HP AT	Petrol	9.1 l/100km	9.5 l/100km+4%
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 T4 200 HP MT	Petrol	8.9 l/100km	9.7 l/100km+9%
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 T4 200 HP AT	Petrol	9.5 l/100km
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 D 102 HP MT	Diesel	5.4 l/100km	6.1 l/100km+13%
1.9Volvo V40 2002 1.9 D 115 HP MT	Diesel	5.4 l/100km	6.0 l/100km+11%

Do you own a Volvo V40? Please submit your fuel consumption!

2000 Volvo V40 2000 wagon Average real petrol consumption difference: +4% Average real diesel consumption difference: +14%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo V40 versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6Volvo V40 2000 1.6 MT	Petrol	7.9 l/100km	8.1 l/100km+3%
1.8Volvo V40 2001 1.8 Bi-Fuel 120 HP MT	Petrol	10.4 l/100km
1.8Volvo V40 2000 1.8 122 HP MT	Petrol	8.1 l/100km	8.3 l/100km+2%
1.8Volvo V40 2000 1.8 122 HP AT	Petrol	8.9 l/100km	9.9 l/100km+11%
1.8Volvo V40 2000 1.8i 125 HP MT	Petrol	6.9 l/100km	8.3 l/100km+20%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 2.0 136 HP MT	Petrol	8.3 l/100km	8.7 l/100km+5%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 2.0 136 HP AT	Petrol	9.1 l/100km	9.5 l/100km+4%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 2.0 T 165 HP MT	Petrol	8.3 l/100km	8.8 l/100km+6%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 2.0 T 165 HP AT	Petrol	9.1 l/100km	9.5 l/100km+4%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 T4 200 HP MT	Petrol	9.2 l/100km	9.8 l/100km+7%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 T4 200 HP AT	Petrol	9.5 l/100km
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 D 102 HP MT	Diesel	5.4 l/100km	6.2 l/100km+15%
1.9Volvo V40 2000 1.9 D 115 HP MT	Diesel	5.4 l/100km	6.1 l/100km+13%

Do you own a Volvo V40? Please submit your fuel consumption!

1996 Volvo V40 1996 wagon Average real petrol consumption difference: +6% Average real diesel consumption difference: +7%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo V40 versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6Volvo V40 1999 1.6 MT	Petrol	8.0 l/100km	8.4 l/100km+5%
1.7Volvo V40 1996 1.7 1.8 MT	Petrol	8.6 l/100km	8.4 l/100km-2%
1.7Volvo V40 1996 1.7 1.8 AT	Petrol	9.1 l/100km	9.9 l/100km+9%
1.8Volvo V40 1999 1.8 122 HP MT	Petrol	8.2 l/100km	8.5 l/100km+4%
1.8Volvo V40 1999 1.8 122 HP AT	Petrol	8.9 l/100km	9.0 l/100km+1%
1.8Volvo V40 1998 1.8i 125 HP MT	Petrol	6.9 l/100km	8.4 l/100km+22%
1.9Volvo V40 1999 1.9 2.0 136 HP MT	Petrol	8.4 l/100km	8.7 l/100km+4%
1.9Volvo V40 1999 1.9 2.0 136 HP AT	Petrol	9.1 l/100km
1.9Volvo V40 1996 1.9 2.0 140 HP MT	Petrol	9.0 l/100km	9.3 l/100km+3%
1.9Volvo V40 1996 1.9 2.0 140 HP AT	Petrol	9.3 l/100km
1.9Volvo V40 1998 1.9 2.0 T 160 HP MT	Petrol	8.9 l/100km	9.8 l/100km+10%
1.9Volvo V40 1998 1.9 2.0 T 160 HP AT	Petrol	9.5 l/100km	10.4 l/100km+9%
1.9Volvo V40 1997 1.9 T4 200 HP MT	Petrol	9.2 l/100km	10.3 l/100km+12%
1.9Volvo V40 1997 1.9 T4 200 HP AT	Petrol	9.7 l/100km	9.5 l/100km-2%
1.9Volvo V40 1997 1.9 TD 90 HP MT	Diesel	6.3 l/100km	6.7 l/100km+6%
1.9Volvo V40 1999 1.9 D 95 HP MT	Diesel	5.6 l/100km	6.0 l/100km+7%

Do you own a Volvo V40? Please submit your fuel consumption!

Real fuel consumption of other carmakers

Alfa Romeo

Audi

BMW

Chevrolet

Chrysler

Citroen

Dacia

Dodge

Fiat

Ford

Honda

Hyundai

Infiniti

Isuzu

Jaguar

Jeep

Kia

Land Rover

Lexus

Mazda

Mercedes

Mini

Mitsubishi

Nissan

Opel

Peugeot

Porsche

Renault

Rover

SAAB

Seat

Skoda

Smart

Subaru

Suzuki

Toyota

Volkswagen

Volvo

The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.