Real Subaru Impreza fuel consumption
Subaru Impreza real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 8% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Subaru Impreza produced from 1993 to 2022.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017
Subaru Impreza 2017 WRX sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0Subaru Impreza 2017 WRX 2.0t MT 4x4 | 9.2 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2017 WRX 2.0t AT 4x4 | 8.6 l/100km | |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2017 WRX STi 2.5 MT 4x4 | 10.4 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km+5% |
2014
Subaru Impreza 2014 WRX sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0Subaru Impreza 2014 WRX 2.0 AWD MT | 9.2 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2014 WRX 2.0 AWD AT | 8.6 l/100km | |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2014 WRX STi 2.5 MT 4x4 | 10.4 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km+11% |
2005
Subaru Impreza 2005 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.5Subaru Impreza 2006 1.5R AWD 105 HP MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+8% |
1.5Subaru Impreza 2006 1.5R AWD 105 HP AT | 8.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+19% |
1.5Subaru Impreza 2006 1.5R AWD Comfort 105 HP MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+6% |
1.5Subaru Impreza 2007 1.5R AWD Comfort Edition 105 HP MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+9% |
1.5Subaru Impreza 2007 1.5R AWD Comfort Edition 105 HP AT | 8.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+19% |
1.5Subaru Impreza 2007 1.5R AWD Edition 105 HP MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+9% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2005 2.0R AWD MT | 9.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+6% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2005 2.0R AWD AT | 8.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km+5% |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2005 2.5 WRX AWD 230 HP MT | 10.3 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km+10% |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2007 2.5 WRX AWD Edition 230 HP MT | 10.3 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+5% |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2005 2.5 WRX STi AWD 280 HP MT | 10.9 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km+25% |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2006 2.5 WRX STi AWD Executive 280 HP MT | 10.9 l/100km | 13.5 l/100km+24% |
2005
Subaru Impreza 2005 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.5Subaru Impreza 2006 Plus 1.5R AWD MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+6% |
1.5Subaru Impreza 2006 Plus 1.5R AWD AT | 8.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+10% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2005 Plus 2.0R AWD MT | 9.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+6% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2005 Plus 2.0R AWD AT | 8.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km+5% |
2.5Subaru Impreza 2006 Plus 2.5 WRX AWD MT | 10.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+9% |
2003
Subaru Impreza 2003 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 2003 1.6 AWD MT | 8.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+12% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 2003 1.6 AWD AT | 8.5 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 2.0 AWD 125 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 2.0 AWD 125 HP AT | 8.6 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 2.0 WRX AWD 225 HP MT | 9.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+17% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 2.0 WRX STi AWD 265 HP MT | 11.1 l/100km | 12.3 l/100km+11% |
2003
Subaru Impreza 2003 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 2003 Plus 1.6 AWD MT | 8.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km+11% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 2003 Plus 1.6 AWD AT | 8.5 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 Plus 2.0 AWD 125 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+6% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 Plus 2.0 AWD 125 HP AT | 8.6 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2003 Plus 2.0 WRX AWD 225 HP MT | 9.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+17% |
2000
Subaru Impreza 2000 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +3%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 2000 1.6 AWD MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+1% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 2002 1.6 AWD AT | 9.6 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2000 2.0 AWD 125 HP MT | 9.6 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+1% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2000 2.0 AWD 125 HP AT | 9.7 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km+1% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2000 2.0 WRX AWD 218 HP MT | 10.2 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+8% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2002 2.0 WRX AWD Unlimited 218 HP MT | 10.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km+13% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2002 2.0 WRX STi AWD 265 HP MT | 12.1 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km+1% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2002 2.0 WRX STi AWD Prodrive 265 HP MT | 12.1 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km-2% |
2000
Subaru Impreza 2000 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +3%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 2000 Plus 1.6 AWD MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+1% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 2002 Plus 1.6 AWD AT | 9.6 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2000 Plus 2.0 AWD 125 HP MT | 9.6 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+1% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2000 Plus 2.0 AWD 125 HP AT | 9.7 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km+1% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 2000 Plus 2.0 WRX AWD 218 HP MT | 10.2 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+8% |
1998
Subaru Impreza 1998 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 1998 1.6 AWD MT | 8.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km-2% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 2.0 AWD 125 HP MT | 9.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+2% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 2.0 AWD 125 HP AT | 9.3 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+4% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 2.0 GT Turbo AWD 218 HP MT | 10.1 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+11% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 2.0 GT Turbo AWD 218 HP MT | 10.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km+10% |
1998
Subaru Impreza 1998 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 1998 Plus 1.6 AWD MT | 8.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km-2% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 Plus 2.0 AWD 125 HP MT | 9.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+2% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 Plus 2.0 AWD 125 HP AT | 9.3 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+4% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1998 Plus 2.0 GT Turbo AWD 218 HP MT | 10.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km+10% |
1997
Subaru Impreza 1997 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 1997 1.6 90 HP MT | 8.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km-2% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1997 1.6 90 HP AT | 9.5 l/100km | |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1997 1.6 LX 90 HP MT | 8.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km-2% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1997 2.0 AWD 116 HP MT | 9.3 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km+11% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1997 2.0 AWD 116 HP AT | 9.7 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1997 2.0 GT Turbo 555 AWD 211 HP MT | 10.2 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km+14% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1997 2.0 GT Turbo AWD 211 HP MT | 10.2 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km+14% |
1993
Subaru Impreza 1993 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +17%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 1993 1.6 90 HP MT | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+8% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1993 1.6 90 HP AT | 8.6 l/100km | |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1993 1.6 LX 90 HP MT | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+8% |
1.8Subaru Impreza 1993 1.8 AWD MT | 8.8 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+9% |
1.8Subaru Impreza 1993 1.8 AWD AT | 9.2 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1996 2.0 AWD 116 HP MT | 9.0 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+22% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1996 2.0 AWD 116 HP AT | 9.0 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1994 2.0 Turbo AWD 211 HP MT | 9.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km+28% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1995 2.0 GT Turbo 555 AWD 211 HP MT | 9.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km+28% |
1993
Subaru Impreza 1993 wagon
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Subaru Impreza versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Subaru Impreza 1993 Plus 1.6 90 HP MT | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+8% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1993 Plus 1.6 90 HP AT | 8.6 l/100km | |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1993 Plus 1.6 LX 90 HP MT | 8.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+8% |
1.6Subaru Impreza 1994 Plus 1.6 4WD 90 HP MT | 8.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+9% |
1.8Subaru Impreza 1993 Plus 1.8 AWD MT | 8.8 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+9% |
1.8Subaru Impreza 1993 Plus 1.8 AWD AT | 9.2 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1996 Plus 2.0 AWD 116 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km+22% |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1996 Plus 2.0 AWD 116 HP AT | 9.0 l/100km | |
2.0Subaru Impreza 1994 Plus 2.0 Turbo AWD 211 HP MT | 9.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km+28% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.