Real Mercedes GL fuel consumption
Mercedes GL real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 14% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 19% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 10% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2012
Mercedes GL 2012
Average real petrol consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes GL versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0Mercedes GL 3.0 400 2012 AT 4x4 | 9.6 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km+14% |
| 3.0Mercedes GL 3.0 350 2012 BlueTec 4Matic AT 4x4 | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 4.7Mercedes GL 4.7 500 2012 BlueEFFICIENCY 4Matic AT 4x4 | 11.3 l/100km | 15.0 l/100km+33% |
| 5.5Mercedes GL 5.5 63 2012 AMG AT 4x4 | 12.3 l/100km |
2006
Mercedes GL 2006
Average real petrol consumption difference: +14% Average real diesel consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes GL versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0Mercedes GL 3.0 350 2009 BlueTEC 211 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.0 l/100km | |
| 3.0Mercedes GL 3.0 320 2006 CDI 224 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.8 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km+11% |
| 3.0Mercedes GL 3.0 350 2009 CDI 4MATIC BlueEfficiency 224 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.6 l/100km | |
| 4.0Mercedes GL 4.0 420 2006 CDI 306 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 11.6 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km+9% |
| 4.0Mercedes GL 4.0 450 2009 CDI 4Matic 306 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 11.6 l/100km | |
| 4.7Mercedes GL 4.7 450 2006 4MATIC AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.3 l/100km | |
| 5.5Mercedes GL 5.5 550 2008 4MATIC 382 HP AT 4x4 | Petrol | 15.9 l/100km | |
| 5.5Mercedes GL 5.5 500 2006 4Matic 388 HP AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.9 l/100km | 15.8 l/100km+14% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.