Real Ford Galaxy fuel consumption
Ford Galaxy real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 16% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Ford Galaxy produced from 1995 to 2020. For Ford Galaxy produced up to 2008 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +7%, while for those produced after 2008 it is on average +30%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2015
Ford Galaxy 2015
Average real petrol consumption difference: +35% Average real diesel consumption difference: +41%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Galaxy versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5Ford Galaxy 2015 1.5 EcoBoost MT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km+35% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 EcoBoost AT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+34% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi 150 HP MT | Diesel | 5.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+42% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi 150 HP AT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+31% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi AWD 150 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+31% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi 180 HP MT | Diesel | 7.0 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi 180 HP AT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+50% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi AWD 180 HP AT | Diesel | 5.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+40% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2015 2.0 TDCi 210 HP AT | Diesel | 5.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+53% |
2010
Ford Galaxy 2010
Average real petrol consumption difference: +26% Average real diesel consumption difference: +26%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Galaxy versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Ford Galaxy 2010 1.6 16v EcoBoost MT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+28% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 16v MT | Petrol | 8.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 16v EcoBoost AT | Petrol | 8.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+23% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 140 HP MT | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+25% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 140 HP AT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+27% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 HP MT | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+25% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 HP AT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+33% |
| 2.2Ford Galaxy 2010 2.2 TDCi MT | Diesel | 6.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+22% |
| 2.2Ford Galaxy 2011 2.2 TDC AT | Diesel | 8.9 l/100km |
2006
Ford Galaxy 2006
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +14%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Galaxy versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 16v MT | Petrol | 8.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+9% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 TDCi AT | Diesel | 7.4 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km+18% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 TDCi MT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+11% |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 2007 2.3 16v AT | Petrol | 10.6 l/100km |
2003
Ford Galaxy 2003
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Galaxy versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2003 1.9 TDI 90 HP MT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+11% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2003 1.9 TDI 115 HP MT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+10% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2003 1.9 TDI 115 HP AT | Diesel | 7.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+7% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2003 1.9 TDI 130 HP MT | Diesel | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+16% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2005 1.9 TDI 150 HP MT | Diesel | 6.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+20% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2003 2.0 MT | Petrol | 10.1 l/100km | |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 2003 2.3 16V MT | Petrol | 10.1 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km+9% |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 2003 2.3 16V AT | Petrol | 11.0 l/100km | |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 2003 2.8 V6 24V MT | Petrol | 10.6 l/100km | |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 2003 2.8 V6 24V AT | Petrol | 11.9 l/100km |
2000
Ford Galaxy 2000
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Galaxy versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2000 1.9 TDI 90 HP MT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km0% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2000 1.9 TDI 115 HP MT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+13% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2000 1.9 TDI 115 HP AT | Diesel | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+3% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 2003 1.9 TDI 130 HP MT | Diesel | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 2001 2.0 MT | Petrol | 10.1 l/100km | |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 2000 2.3 16V MT | Petrol | 10.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km+8% |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 2000 2.3 16V AT | Petrol | 11.0 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km+11% |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 2000 2.8 V6 24V MT | Petrol | 10.6 l/100km | |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 2000 2.8 V6 24V AT | Petrol | 11.9 l/100km |
1995
Ford Galaxy 1995
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor Average real diesel consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Galaxy versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 1995 1.9 TDI 90 HP MT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+3% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 1997 1.9 TDI 110 HP MT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+11% |
| 1.9Ford Galaxy 1998 1.9 TDI 110 HP AT | Diesel | 7.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 1995 2.0i MT | Petrol | 10.0 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km-2% |
| 2.0Ford Galaxy 1995 2.0i AT | Petrol | 10.0 l/100km | |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 1997 2.3i 16V MT | Petrol | 10.1 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+5% |
| 2.3Ford Galaxy 1997 2.3i 16V AT | Petrol | 10.8 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km0% |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 1995 2.8i V6 174 HP MT | Petrol | 12.7 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km0% |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 1995 2.8i V6 174 HP AT | Petrol | 12.7 l/100km | 12.9 l/100km+2% |
| 2.8Ford Galaxy 1997 2.8i V6 4x4 174 HP AT | Petrol | 13.8 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.