Real Chrysler PT Cruiser fuel consumption
Chrysler PT Cruiser real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 8% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Chrysler PT Cruiser produced from 2000 to 2010. For Chrysler PT Cruiser produced up to 2005 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +9%, while for those produced after 2005 it is on average +13%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2006
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler PT Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 1.6i MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+17% |
| 2.2Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 2.2 CRD MT | Diesel | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+7% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 2.4i 143 HP MT | Petrol | 9.4 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+3% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 2.4i 143 HP AT | Petrol | 10.1 l/100km | |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 2.4i GT Turbo 223 HP MT | Petrol | 9.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+17% |
2006
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: +6%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler PT Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 Cabrio 2.4i Limited 143 HP MT | 9.4 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+3% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 Cabrio 2.4i Limited 143 HP AT | 10.4 l/100km | |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 Cabrio 2.4i GT Turbo 223 HP MT | 9.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km+18% |
2004
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler PT Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 Cabrio 2.4i Limited 143 HP MT | 9.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km-2% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 Cabrio 2.4i Limited 143 HP AT | 10.8 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km+15% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 Cabrio 2.4i GT Turbo 223 HP MT | 9.9 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+9% |
2000
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10% Average real diesel consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler PT Cruiser versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Chrysler PT Cruiser 2003 1.6i MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km+17% |
| 2.0Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 2.0i MT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+9% |
| 2.0Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 2.0i AT | Petrol | 9.8 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km+6% |
| 2.1Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 2.1 2.2 CRD MT | Diesel | 6.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+9% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 2.4i 143 HP MT | Petrol | 9.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km-1% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 2.4i 143 HP AT | Petrol | 10.5 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km+19% |
| 2.4Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 2.4i GT Turbo 223 HP MT | Petrol | 10.0 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+8% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.