Real Chrysler Neon fuel consumption
Chrysler Neon real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 5% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
1999
Chrysler Neon 1999
Average real petrol consumption difference: +10%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Chrysler Neon versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6Chrysler Neon 2001 1.6i 16V MT | 7.3 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+5% |
| 1.8Chrysler Neon 1999 1.8 16V AT | 8.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Chrysler Neon 1999 2.0i 16V 133 HP MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+5% |
| 2.0Chrysler Neon 1999 2.0i 16V 133 HP AT | 8.8 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Chrysler Neon 2002 2.0i 16V 133 HP AT | 8.8 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.