Real Volvo C70 fuel consumption
Volvo C70 real fuel consumption by user reviews is similar compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Volvo C70 produced from 1997 to 2013. For Volvo C70 produced up to 2005 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +10%, while for those produced after 2005 it is on average +4%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2009
Volvo C70 2009
Average real petrol consumption difference: +6% Average real diesel consumption difference: +4%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo C70 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0Volvo C70 2009 2.0 D3 136 HP MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+8% |
| 2.0Volvo C70 2009 2.0 D3 136 HP AT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Volvo C70 2011 2.0 D4 177 HP MT | Diesel | 5.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+7% |
| 2.0Volvo C70 2011 2.0 D4 177 HP AT | Diesel | 6.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+8% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2009 2.4 140 HP MT | Petrol | 8.9 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km+10% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2009 2.4 140 HP AT | Petrol | 9.6 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+6% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2009 2.4i 170 HP MT | Petrol | 9.0 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+8% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2009 2.4i 170 HP AT | Petrol | 9.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km-2% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2009 2.4 D5 MT | Diesel | 6.6 l/100km | |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2009 2.4 D5 AT | Diesel | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+4% |
| 2.5Volvo C70 2009 2.5 T5 MT | Petrol | 8.9 l/100km | |
| 2.5Volvo C70 2009 2.5 T5 AT | Petrol | 9.4 l/100km |
2006
Volvo C70 2006
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo C70 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Volvo C70 2007 2.0 D AT | 6.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Volvo C70 2007 2.0D MT | 6.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km+5% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4 140 HP MT | 8.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km+3% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4 140 HP AT | 9.6 l/100km | |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4i 170 HP MT | 9.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km+3% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4i 170 HP AT | 9.6 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+4% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4 D 163 HP AT | 7.3 l/100km | |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4 D5 180 HP MT | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+5% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2006 2.4 D5 180 HP AT | 7.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km-1% |
| 2.5Volvo C70 2006 2.5 T5 220 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km-1% |
| 2.5Volvo C70 2006 2.5 T5 220 HP AT | 9.8 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km0% |
| 2.5Volvo C70 2006 2.5 T5 20V 230 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | |
| 2.5Volvo C70 2006 2.5 T5 20V 230 HP AT | 9.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km+3% |
1997
Volvo C70 1997
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volvo C70 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Volvo C70 1999 2.0 T 163 HP MT | 9.7 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km0% |
| 2.0Volvo C70 1999 2.0 T 163 HP AT | 10.6 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km-1% |
| 2.0Volvo C70 1997 2.0 20V 180 HP MT | 11.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Volvo C70 1997 2.0 20V Turbo 225 HP MT | 11.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Volvo C70 1997 2.0 20V Turbo 225 HP AT | 11.3 l/100km | |
| 2.3Volvo C70 1999 2.3 T5 MT | 9.9 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km+10% |
| 2.3Volvo C70 1999 2.3 T5 AT | 11.2 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km-1% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 1997 2.4 2.5 20V 170 HP MT | 9.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km-3% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 1997 2.4 2.5 20V 170 HP AT | 9.5 l/100km | |
| 2.4Volvo C70 1999 2.4 T 193 HP MT | 9.5 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km0% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 1999 2.4 T 193 HP AT | 11.0 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km-2% |
| 2.4Volvo C70 2002 2.4 i 20V 200 HP MT | 9.9 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.