Real Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 34% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 40% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2014
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
Average real petrol consumption difference: +27% Average real diesel consumption difference: +40%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 TSI 86 HP MT | Petrol | 4.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km+29% |
| 1.2Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 TSI 110 HP MT | Petrol | 5.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+22% |
| 1.2Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 TSI 110 HP AT | Petrol | 5.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+30% |
| 1.4Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.4 TSI 125 HP MT | Petrol | 5.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+20% |
| 1.4Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.4 TSI 125 HP AT | Petrol | 5.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+31% |
| 1.4Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.4 TSI 150 HP MT | Petrol | 5.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+22% |
| 1.4Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.4 TSI 150 HP AT | Petrol | 5.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+33% |
| 1.6Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.6 TDI MT | Diesel | 3.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+50% |
| 1.6Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.6 TDI AT | Diesel | 4.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+45% |
| 2.0Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 2.0 TDI MT | Diesel | 4.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km+33% |
| 2.0Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 2.0 TDI AT | Diesel | 4.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+32% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.