Real Volkswagen Golf Plus fuel consumption

Volkswagen Golf Plus real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 12% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.

2009 Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 Average real petrol consumption difference: +17% Average real diesel consumption difference: +15%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volkswagen Golf Plus versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.2Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.2 16V TSI MT	Petrol	5.5 l/100km	6.8 l/100km+24%
1.2Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.2 16V TSI AT	Petrol	5.9 l/100km	7.5 l/100km+27%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.4 16V 80 HP MT	Petrol	6.6 l/100km	6.9 l/100km+5%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.4 16V TSI 122 HP MT	Petrol	6.5 l/100km	7.0 l/100km+8%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.4 16V TSI 122 HP AT	Petrol	6.3 l/100km	7.4 l/100km+17%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.4 16V TSI 160 HP MT	Petrol	6.5 l/100km	7.7 l/100km+18%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.4 16V TSI 160 HP AT	Petrol	6.3 l/100km	8.4 l/100km+33%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 MT	Petrol	7.6 l/100km	8.1 l/100km+7%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 AT	Petrol	6.8 l/100km
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 TDI 90 HP MT	Diesel	4.7 l/100km	5.6 l/100km+19%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 TDI 105 HP MT	Diesel	4.8 l/100km	5.5 l/100km+15%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 TDI 105 HP AT	Diesel	4.9 l/100km	5.7 l/100km+16%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 2.0 TDI 110 HP MT	Diesel	5.1 l/100km	5.7 l/100km+12%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 2.0 TDI 110 HP AT	Diesel	5.5 l/100km	6.2 l/100km+13%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 2.0 TDI 140 HP MT	Diesel	5.1 l/100km	5.8 l/100km+14%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 2.0 TDI 140 HP AT	Diesel	5.6 l/100km	6.5 l/100km+16%

Do you own a Volkswagen Golf Plus? Please submit your fuel consumption!

2005 Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 Average real petrol consumption difference: +6% Average real diesel consumption difference: +8%

Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Volkswagen Golf Plus versions are shown in the table below.

Modification	Fuel	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.4 16V 75 HP MT	Petrol	7.1 l/100km	7.7 l/100km+8%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2006 1.4 16V 80 HP MT	Petrol	7.2 l/100km	7.3 l/100km+1%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2007 1.4 16V TSI 122 HP MT	Petrol	6.6 l/100km	7.1 l/100km+8%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2006 1.4 16V TSI 140 HP MT	Petrol	7.2 l/100km	7.1 l/100km-1%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2006 1.4 16V TSI 140 HP AT	Petrol	7.2 l/100km	8.6 l/100km+19%
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2006 1.4 16V TSI 170 HP MT	Petrol	7.4 l/100km
1.4Volkswagen Golf Plus 2006 1.4 16V TSI 170 HP AT	Petrol	7.4 l/100km
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.6 102 HP MT	Petrol	7.7 l/100km	8.0 l/100km+4%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.6 102 HP AT	Petrol	8.5 l/100km	8.7 l/100km+2%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP MT	Petrol	7.2 l/100km	7.2 l/100km0%
1.6Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP AT	Petrol	8.0 l/100km	8.6 l/100km+8%
1.9Volkswagen Golf Plus 2006 1.9 TDI 90 HP MT	Diesel	5.4 l/100km	6.2 l/100km+15%
1.9Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.9 TDI 105 HP MT	Diesel	5.4 l/100km	5.8 l/100km+7%
1.9Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 1.9 TDI 105 HP AT	Diesel	5.9 l/100km	6.0 l/100km+2%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 2.0 16V FSI MT	Petrol	8.1 l/100km	9.3 l/100km+15%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 2.0 16V FSI AT	Petrol	8.6 l/100km	8.9 l/100km+3%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 2.0 TDI MT	Diesel	5.7 l/100km	6.0 l/100km+5%
2.0Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 2.0 TDI AT	Diesel	6.2 l/100km	6.9 l/100km+11%

Do you own a Volkswagen Golf Plus? Please submit your fuel consumption!

Real fuel consumption of other carmakers

Alfa Romeo

Audi

BMW

Chevrolet

Chrysler

Citroen

Dacia

Dodge

Fiat

Ford

Honda

Hyundai

Infiniti

Isuzu

Jaguar

Jeep

Kia

Land Rover

Lexus

Mazda

Mercedes

Mini

Mitsubishi

Nissan

Opel

Peugeot

Porsche

Renault

Rover

SAAB

Seat

Skoda

Smart

Subaru

Suzuki

Toyota

Volkswagen

Volvo

The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.