Real Toyota Celica fuel consumption
Toyota Celica real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 7% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Toyota Celica produced from 1990 to 2005. For Toyota Celica produced up to 1998 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +13%, while for those produced after 1998 it is on average minor.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2002
Toyota Celica 2002 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Celica versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 VVT-i 143 HP MT | 7.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km+1% |
1.8Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 VVTL-i T Sport 192 HP MT | 8.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+2% |
1999
Toyota Celica 1999 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Celica versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 VVT-i 143 HP MT | 7.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+3% |
1.8Toyota Celica 2000 1.8 VVTL-i T Sport 192 HP MT | 8.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+2% |
1995
Toyota Celica 1995 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Celica versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0Toyota Celica 1995 2.0 MT | 9.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+3% |
1994
Toyota Celica 1994 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Celica versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.8Toyota Celica 1994 1.8i MT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km+4% |
2.0Toyota Celica 1994 2.0i GT 175 HP MT | 9.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km-2% |
2.0Toyota Celica 1995 2.0i GT Turbo 4WD 242 HP MT | 9.5 l/100km |
1991
Toyota Celica 1991 cabrio
Average real petrol consumption difference: +24%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Celica versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0Toyota Celica 1991 2.0 GTi (ST182) MT | 8.0 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+24% |
1990
Toyota Celica 1990 coupe
Average real petrol consumption difference: +21%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Celica versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6Toyota Celica 1990 1.6 STi MT | 7.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+14% |
1.6Toyota Celica 1990 1.6 STi Automatic AT | 7.0 l/100km | |
1.8Toyota Celica 1993 1.8i 16V MT | 8.5 l/100km | |
1.8Toyota Celica 1993 1.8i 16V Automatic AT | 8.5 l/100km | |
2.0Toyota Celica 1990 2.0 GTi 156 HP MT | 7.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km+28% |
2.0Toyota Celica 1990 2.0i Turbo 4WD 204 HP MT | 9.2 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.