Real Toyota Carina E fuel consumption
Toyota Carina E real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 11% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 9% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 12% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
1992
Toyota Carina E 1992
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Toyota Carina E versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Toyota Carina E 1992 1.6 MT | Petrol | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+6% |
| 1.8Toyota Carina E 1995 1.8 MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+9% |
| 2.0Toyota Carina E 1992 2.0 133 Hp 133 HP MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+3% |
| 2.0Toyota Carina E 1992 2.0 133 Hp Automatic 133 HP AT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km+25% |
| 2.0Toyota Carina E 1992 2.0 158 Hp 158 HP MT | Petrol | 8.5 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km+4% |
| 2.0Toyota Carina E 1994 2.0 175 Hp 175 HP MT | Petrol | 7.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Toyota Carina E 1992 2.0 D MT | Diesel | 5.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+12% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.