Real Skoda Yeti fuel consumption
Skoda Yeti real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 13% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2013
Skoda Yeti 2013 FL
Average real petrol consumption difference: +18% Average real diesel consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Skoda Yeti versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2Skoda Yeti 2013 1.2 TSI MT | Petrol | 6.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+16% |
| 1.2Skoda Yeti 2013 1.2 TSI AT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+21% |
| 1.4Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 TSI MT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+12% |
| 1.4Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 TSI AT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km+23% |
| 1.8Skoda Yeti 2013 1.8 TSI 4x4 AT | Petrol | 8.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2013 2.0 TDI 110 HP MT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2015 2.0 TDI 110 HP MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2015 2.0 TDI 110 HP MT 4x4 | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2013 2.0 TDI 140 HP MT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2013 2.0 TDI 4x4 140 HP AT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+13% |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2013 2.0 TDI 170 HP MT 4x4 | Diesel | 5.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2013 2.0 TDI 170 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km |
2009
Skoda Yeti 2009
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Skoda Yeti versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 AT | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 1.2Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 MT | 6.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+9% |
| 1.8Skoda Yeti 2009 1.8 AT 4x4 | 11.9 l/100km | |
| 1.8Skoda Yeti 2009 1.8 MT 4x4 | 8.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Yeti 2009 2.0 TDI 4WD MT | 6.5 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.
