Real Skoda Karoq fuel consumption
Skoda Karoq real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 34% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 31% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 36% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2017
Skoda Karoq 2017
Average real petrol consumption difference: +31% Average real diesel consumption difference: +36%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Skoda Karoq versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0Skoda Karoq 2017 1.0 TSI MT | Petrol | 5.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+27% |
| 1.0Skoda Karoq 2017 1.0 TSI AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | |
| 1.5Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 TSI MT | Petrol | 5.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km+35% |
| 1.5Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 TSI AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | |
| 1.6Skoda Karoq 2017 1.6 TDI MT | Diesel | 4.5 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km+31% |
| 1.6Skoda Karoq 2017 1.6 TDI AT | Diesel | 6.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Karoq 2017 2.0 TDI 150 HP MT | Diesel | 6.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Karoq 2017 2.0 TDI 150 HP AT | Diesel | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Karoq 2017 2.0 TDI 4x4 150 HP AT | Diesel | 6.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Skoda Karoq 2017 2.0 TDI 4x4 190 HP AT | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+42% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.