Real Rover 45 fuel consumption
Rover 45 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 7% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 3% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 10% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
1999
Rover 45 1999 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +3% Average real diesel consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Rover 45 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4Rover 45 1999 1.4 MT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Rover 45 1999 1.6 MT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+6% |
| 1.8Rover 45 1999 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km0% |
| 1.8Rover 45 1999 1.8 Automatic AT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Rover 45 2002 2.0 V6 AT | Petrol | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Rover 45 1999 2.0 IDT 100 Hp 100 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+11% |
| 2.0Rover 45 2004 2.0 IDT 113 Hp 113 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km |
1999
Rover 45 1999 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +3% Average real diesel consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Rover 45 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4Rover 45 1999 1.4 i 16V MT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Rover 45 1999 1.6 MT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+4% |
| 1.8Rover 45 1999 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+1% |
| 1.8Rover 45 1999 1.8 Automatic AT | Petrol | 8.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Rover 45 1999 2.0 V6 AT | Petrol | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Rover 45 1999 2.0 IDT 100 Hp 100 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+11% |
| 2.0Rover 45 2004 2.0 IDT 113 Hp 113 HP MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+7% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.