Real Rover 25 fuel consumption
Rover 25 real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 14% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 9% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
1999
Rover 25 1999
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +18%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Rover 25 versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1Rover 25 2002 1.1 i 16V MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | |
| 1.4Rover 25 2001 1.4 84 HP MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | |
| 1.4Rover 25 1999 1.4 103 HP MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+14% |
| 1.6Rover 25 1999 1.6 MT | Petrol | 6.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km+4% |
| 1.6Rover 25 2002 1.6 AT | Petrol | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 1.8Rover 25 1999 1.8 115 HP AT | Petrol | 8.2 l/100km | |
| 1.8Rover 25 1999 1.8 i 16V 145 HP MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 1.8Rover 25 2000 1.8 Vi 145 HP AT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Rover 25 1999 2.0 IDT 100 HP MT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+18% |
| 2.0Rover 25 2004 2.0 IDT 113 HP MT | Diesel | 5.2 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.