Real Mitsubishi Lancer fuel consumption
Mitsubishi Lancer real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 5% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 8% higher, but for diesel engines similar to manufacturer's stated consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Mitsubishi Lancer produced from 1994 to 2010.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2007
Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi Lancer versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 1.5 MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km+6% |
| 1.5Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 1.5 AT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km | |
| 1.8Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 1.8 MT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+8% |
| 1.8Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 1.8 AT | Petrol | 7.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km+23% |
| 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 2.0 MT | Petrol | 8.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 2.0 AT | Petrol | 8.4 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer 2007 2.0 DI-D MT | Diesel | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+2% |
2004
Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi Lancer versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 1.3 i 16V MT | 6.5 l/100km | |
| 1.6Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 1.6 i 16V MT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+9% |
| 1.6Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 1.6 i 16V AT | 7.9 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km+11% |
| 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 2.0i MT | 8.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km+2% |
1996
Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
Average real petrol consumption difference: +6%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi Lancer versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 1.3i MT | 6.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+6% |
| 1.3Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 1.3i AT | 8.0 l/100km |
1994
Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mitsubishi Lancer versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 1.3i MT | 7.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km0% |
| 1.6Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 1.6i MT | 7.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+17% |
| 1.6Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 1.6i AT | 7.5 l/100km | |
| 1.8Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 1.8 GTi MT | 7.9 l/100km | |
| 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer 1994 2.0 D MT | 6.1 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.