Real Mercedes ML fuel consumption
Mercedes ML real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 18% higher compared to official consumption. Above consumption difference is the average for all Mercedes ML produced from 1998 to 2016. For Mercedes ML produced up to 2007 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +9%, while for those produced after 2007 it is on average +31%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2011
Mercedes ML 2011
Average real petrol consumption difference: +48% Average real diesel consumption difference: +46%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes ML versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1Mercedes ML 2.1 250 2011 BlueTEC 4Matic AT 4x4 | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+42% |
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 400 2011 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 9.3 l/100km | |
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 350 2011 BlueTEC 4Matic AT 4x4 | Diesel | 6.8 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km+50% |
| 3.5Mercedes ML 3.5 350 2011 4Matic AT 4x4 | Petrol | 8.5 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km+48% |
| 4.7Mercedes ML 4.7 500 2011 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.4 l/100km |
2008
Mercedes ML 2008
Average real petrol consumption difference: +15% Average real diesel consumption difference: +16%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes ML versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 280 2008 CDI 190 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km+20% |
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 300 2009 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 4Matic 190 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 8.4 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+26% |
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 320 2008 CDI 224 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.3 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km+15% |
| 3.5Mercedes ML 3.5 350 2008 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 11.2 l/100km | 13.9 l/100km+24% |
| 4.0Mercedes ML 4.0 420 2008 CDI AT 4x4 | Diesel | 11.0 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km+3% |
| 5.5Mercedes ML 5.5 500 2008 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 12.8 l/100km | 14.6 l/100km+14% |
| 6.2Mercedes ML 6.2 63 2008 AMG AT 4x4 | Petrol | 16.5 l/100km | 17.5 l/100km+6% |
2005
Mercedes ML 2005
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +11%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes ML versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 280 2005 CDI 190 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km+14% |
| 3.0Mercedes ML 3.0 320 2005 CDI 224 HP AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.4 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km+15% |
| 3.5Mercedes ML 3.5 350 2005 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 12.0 l/100km | 12.9 l/100km+8% |
| 4.0Mercedes ML 4.0 420 2006 CDI AT 4x4 | Diesel | 11.0 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km+4% |
| 5.0Mercedes ML 5.0 500 2005 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.0 l/100km | 15.1 l/100km+16% |
| 6.2Mercedes ML 6.2 63 2006 AMG AT 4x4 | Petrol | 16.0 l/100km | 16.6 l/100km+4% |
2001
Mercedes ML 2001
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13% Average real diesel consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes ML versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.7Mercedes ML 2.7 270 2001 CDI MT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km-1% |
| 2.7Mercedes ML 2.7 270 2001 CDI AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+12% |
| 3.2Mercedes ML 3.2 320 2001 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.5 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km+1% |
| 3.7Mercedes ML 3.7 350 2002 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 14.1 l/100km | |
| 4.0Mercedes ML 4.0 400 2001 CDI AT 4x4 | Diesel | 10.9 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km+10% |
| 5.0Mercedes ML 5.0 500 2001 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 14.6 l/100km | 16.5 l/100km+13% |
| 5.4Mercedes ML 5.4 55 2001 AMG AT 4x4 | Petrol | 14.8 l/100km | 18.6 l/100km+26% |
1998
Mercedes ML 1998
Average real petrol consumption difference: +5% Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes ML versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3Mercedes ML 2.3 230 1998 MT 4x4 | Petrol | 12.7 l/100km | 13.5 l/100km+6% |
| 2.7Mercedes ML 2.7 270 1999 CDI MT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.4 l/100km | |
| 2.7Mercedes ML 2.7 270 1999 CDI AT 4x4 | Diesel | 9.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+12% |
| 3.2Mercedes ML 3.2 320 1998 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.8 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km-1% |
| 4.3Mercedes ML 4.3 430 1999 AT 4x4 | Petrol | 13.9 l/100km | 14.5 l/100km+4% |
| 5.4Mercedes ML 5.4 55 1999 AMG AT 4x4 | Petrol | 14.4 l/100km | 15.9 l/100km+10% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.