Car reviews Car technical data Find your car

Real Mercedes CLK fuel consumption

Mercedes CLK real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 2% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 4% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Mercedes CLK produced from 1997 to 2009. For Mercedes CLK produced up to 2003 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +3%, while for those produced after 2003 it is on average +7%.

Average difference between user reported and stated consumption

All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported


See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2005 Mercedes CLK 2005 coupe Average real petrol consumption difference: +9% Average real diesel consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationFuelClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2005 Kompressor 163 HP MT Petrol 8.3 l/100km 8.7 l/100km+5%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2005 Kompressor Automatic 163 HP AT Petrol 8.4 l/100km 8.8 l/100km+5%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2006 Kompressor 184 HP MT Petrol 8.3 l/100km 10.1 l/100km+22%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2006 Kompressor Automatic 184 HP AT Petrol 8.4 l/100km 9.6 l/100km+14%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 280 2005 MT Petrol 9.2 l/100km 9.4 l/100km+2%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 280 2005 Automatic AT Petrol 9.2 l/100km 9.8 l/100km+7%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 220 2005 CDI 150 HP MT Diesel 6.4 l/100km
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 220 2005 CDI Automatic 150 HP AT Diesel 6.8 l/100km 7.0 l/100km+3%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 320 2005 CDI 224 HP MT Diesel 7.2 l/100km
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 320 2005 CDI Automatic 224 HP AT Diesel 7.5 l/100km 8.0 l/100km+7%
3.5Mercedes CLK 3.5 350 2005 AT Petrol 9.9 l/100km 11.3 l/100km+14%
5.0Mercedes CLK 5.0 500 2005 AT Petrol 10.9 l/100km 10.8 l/100km-1%
5.4Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 2005 AMG AT Petrol 12.8 l/100km
5.5Mercedes CLK 5.5 500 2006 AT Petrol 11.4 l/100km 13.3 l/100km+17%
6.2Mercedes CLK 6.2 63 2006 AMG AT Petrol 14.2 l/100km
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
2005 Mercedes CLK 2005 cabrio Average real petrol consumption difference: +7% Average real diesel consumption difference: +3%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationFuelClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2005 Kompressor Cabriolet 163 HP MT Petrol 8.6 l/100km 8.7 l/100km+1%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2005 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 163 HP AT Petrol 8.7 l/100km 8.8 l/100km+1%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2006 Kompressor Cabriolet 184 HP MT Petrol 8.3 l/100km 10.1 l/100km+22%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2006 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 184 HP AT Petrol 8.4 l/100km 9.6 l/100km+14%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 280 2005 Cabriolet MT Petrol 9.5 l/100km 9.4 l/100km-1%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 280 2005 Cabriolet Automatic AT Petrol 9.3 l/100km 9.8 l/100km+5%
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 320 2005 CDI Cabriolet MT Diesel 7.5 l/100km
3.0Mercedes CLK 3.0 320 2005 CDI Cabriolet Automatic AT Diesel 7.8 l/100km 8.0 l/100km+3%
3.5Mercedes CLK 3.5 350 2005 Cabriolet AT Petrol 10.1 l/100km 11.3 l/100km+12%
5.0Mercedes CLK 5.0 500 2005 Cabriolet 306 HP AT Petrol 11.1 l/100km 11.9 l/100km+7%
5.0Mercedes CLK 5.0 500 2006 Cabriolet 388 HP AT Petrol 11.6 l/100km 13.3 l/100km+15%
5.4Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 2005 AMG Cabriolet AT Petrol 12.1 l/100km
6.2Mercedes CLK 6.2 63 2006 AMG Cabriolet AT Petrol 14.4 l/100km
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
2003 Mercedes CLK 2003 cabrio Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2003 Kompressor Cabriolet MT 9.1 l/100km 9.7 l/100km+7%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2003 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic AT 9.2 l/100km 9.2 l/100km0%
2.6Mercedes CLK 2.6 240 2003 Cabriolet MT 11.2 l/100km
2.6Mercedes CLK 2.6 240 2003 Cabriolet Automatic AT 10.4 l/100km 10.7 l/100km+3%
3.2Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 2003 Cabriolet AT 10.9 l/100km 11.1 l/100km+2%
5.0Mercedes CLK 5.0 500 2003 Cabriolet AT 11.6 l/100km 12.8 l/100km+10%
5.4Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 2003 AMG AT 12.3 l/100km 12.8 l/100km+4%
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
2002 Mercedes CLK 2002 coupe Average real diesel consumption difference: +3%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2002 Kompressor MT 8.6 l/100km 8.6 l/100km0%
1.8Mercedes CLK 1.8 200 2002 Kompressor Automatic AT 8.7 l/100km 9.2 l/100km+6%
2.6Mercedes CLK 2.6 240 2002 MT 10.8 l/100km
2.6Mercedes CLK 2.6 240 2002 Automatic AT 10.4 l/100km 10.6 l/100km+2%
2.7Mercedes CLK 2.7 270 2002 CDI MT 6.7 l/100km 6.6 l/100km-1%
2.7Mercedes CLK 2.7 270 2002 CDI Automatic AT 6.9 l/100km 7.4 l/100km+7%
3.2Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 2002 AT 10.4 l/100km 11.1 l/100km+7%
5.0Mercedes CLK 5.0 500 2002 AT 11.5 l/100km 12.2 l/100km+6%
5.4Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 2002 AMG AT 12.8 l/100km 12.8 l/100km0%
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
1999 Mercedes CLK 1999 coupe Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 136 HP MT 9.4 l/100km 9.5 l/100km+1%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 Automatic 136 HP AT 9.5 l/100km 9.3 l/100km-2%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor 163 HP MT 9.4 l/100km 9.6 l/100km+2%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor Automatic 163 HP AT 9.3 l/100km 10.1 l/100km+9%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor 193 HP MT 9.8 l/100km 9.8 l/100km0%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor Automatic 193 HP AT 9.9 l/100km 10.5 l/100km+6%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor 197 HP MT 9.6 l/100km 10.0 l/100km+4%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Automatic 197 HP AT 9.5 l/100km 9.9 l/100km+4%
3.2Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 1999 AT 10.1 l/100km
4.3Mercedes CLK 4.3 430 1999 AT 11.4 l/100km 11.2 l/100km-2%
5.4Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 1999 AMG AT 11.7 l/100km
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
1999 Mercedes CLK 1999 cabrio Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 Cabriolet 136 HP MT 9.4 l/100km 9.5 l/100km+1%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 Cabriolet Automatic 136 HP AT 9.6 l/100km 10.2 l/100km+6%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet 163 HP MT 9.5 l/100km 9.6 l/100km+1%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 163 HP AT 9.4 l/100km 9.6 l/100km+2%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor Cabriolet 193 HP MT 10.1 l/100km 10.8 l/100km+7%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 193 HP AT 10.3 l/100km 10.5 l/100km+2%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet 197 HP MT 9.6 l/100km 10.0 l/100km+4%
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 197 HP AT 9.6 l/100km 9.9 l/100km+3%
3.2Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 1999 Cabriolet AT 10.9 l/100km 11.2 l/100km+3%
4.3Mercedes CLK 4.3 430 1999 Cabriolet AT 12.2 l/100km 12.3 l/100km+1%
5.4Mercedes CLK 1999 5.4 AMG CLK 55 V8 AT 11.7 l/100km
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
1998 Mercedes CLK 1998 cabrio Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1998 Cabriolet 136 HP AT 9.6 l/100km 9.4 l/100km-2%
2.0Mercedes CLK 1998 2.0 CLK 200 136 HP MT 9.4 l/100km
2.0Mercedes CLK 1998 2.0 CLK 200 Kompressor 192 HP MT 9.9 l/100km
2.0Mercedes CLK 1998 2.0 CLK 200 Kompressor Automatic 192 HP AT 10.3 l/100km
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1998 Kompressor Cabriolet AT 10.3 l/100km 10.8 l/100km+5%
2.3Mercedes CLK 1998 2.3 CLK 230 Kompressor MT 10.1 l/100km
3.2Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 1998 Cabriolet AT 10.6 l/100km
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!
1997 Mercedes CLK 1997 coupe Average real petrol consumption difference: minor
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Mercedes CLK versions are shown in the table below.
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1997 136 HP MT 9.4 l/100km 9.6 l/100km+2%
2.0Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1997 Automatic 136 HP AT 9.5 l/100km 9.5 l/100km0%
2.0Mercedes CLK 1997 2.0 CLK 200 Kompressor 192 HP MT 9.5 l/100km
2.0Mercedes CLK 1997 2.0 CLK 200 Kompressor Automatic 192 HP AT 9.8 l/100km
2.3Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1997 Kompressor AT 9.9 l/100km 10.5 l/100km+6%
2.3Mercedes CLK 1997 2.3 CLK 230 Kompressor MT 9.8 l/100km
3.2Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 1997 AT 10.1 l/100km
4.3Mercedes CLK 4.3 430 1998 AT 11.2 l/100km 11.0 l/100km-2%
Do you own a Mercedes CLK? Please submit your fuel consumption!

Real fuel consumption of other carmakers

Alfa Romeo
Audi
BMW
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Citroen
Dacia
Dodge
Fiat
Ford
Honda
Hyundai
Infiniti
Isuzu
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Land Rover
Lexus
Mazda
Mercedes
Mini
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Opel
Peugeot
Porsche
Renault
Rover
SAAB
Seat
Skoda
Smart
Subaru
Suzuki
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo

The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.

Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy
Follow us on Facebook!
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv