Real Kia RIO fuel consumption
Kia RIO real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 30% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 22% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 38% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Kia RIO produced from 1999 to 2022. For Kia RIO produced up to 2011 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +18%, while for those produced after 2011 it is on average +29%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2020
Kia RIO 2020 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +27%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0Kia RIO 2020 1.0 T-GDI 100 HP MT | 5.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+20% |
1.0Kia RIO 2020 1.0 T-GDI 100 HP AT | 4.8 l/100km | |
1.0Kia RIO 2020 1.0 T-GDI 120 HP MT | 4.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+38% |
1.0Kia RIO 2020 1.0 T-GDI 120 HP AT | 4.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+62% |
1.2Kia RIO 2020 1.2i MT | 5.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+15% |
1.4Kia Rio 2020 X 1.4 MT | 5.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+2% |
1.4Kia Rio 2020 X 1.4 AT | 6.8 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2020 X 1.6 MT | 6.6 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2020 X 1.6 AT | 6.8 l/100km |
2020
Kia RIO 2020 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +5%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Kia Rio 2020 1.4 MT | 5.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km+5% |
1.4Kia Rio 2020 1.4 AT | 6.4 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2020 1.6 MT | 6.0 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2020 1.6 AT | 6.6 l/100km |
2017
Kia RIO 2017 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +22%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.0Kia RIO 2017 1.0 T-GDI 100 HP MT | 6.2 l/100km | |
1.0Kia RIO 2017 1.0 T-GDI 120 HP MT | 4.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+38% |
1.2Kia RIO 2017 1.25 MPI MT | 6.3 l/100km | |
1.4Kia Rio 2017 X-Line 1.4 MT | 5.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+5% |
1.4Kia Rio 2017 X-Line 1.4 AT | 6.6 l/100km | |
1.4Kia RIO 2017 1.4 CRDi MT | 4.8 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2017 X-Line 1.6 MT | 6.6 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2017 X-Line 1.6 AT | 6.8 l/100km |
2017
Kia RIO 2017 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +9%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Kia Rio 2017 1.4 MT | 5.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+9% |
1.4Kia Rio 2017 1.4 AT | 6.4 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2017 1.6 MT | 6.0 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2017 1.6 AT | 6.6 l/100km |
2015
Kia RIO 2015 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +32% Average real diesel consumption difference: +38%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.1Kia RIO 2015 1.1 CRDI MT | Diesel | 3.6 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km+39% |
1.2Kia RIO 2015 1.2 84 HP MT | Petrol | 4.7 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+43% |
1.2Kia RIO 2015 1.2 84 HP MT | Petrol | 5.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km+34% |
1.4Kia Rio 2015 1.4 MT | Petrol | 5.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+24% |
1.4Kia Rio 2015 1.4 AT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+30% |
1.4Kia RIO 2015 1.4 CRDI MT | Diesel | 3.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km+37% |
1.6Kia Rio 2015 1.6 MT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2015 1.6 AT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km |
2015
Kia RIO 2015 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +27%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4Kia Rio 2015 1.4 MT | 5.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+24% |
1.4Kia Rio 2015 1.4 AT | 6.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+30% |
1.6Kia Rio 2015 1.6 MT | 6.4 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2015 1.6 AT | 6.4 l/100km |
2011
Kia RIO 2011 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +37% Average real diesel consumption difference: +59%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.1Kia Rio 2011 1.1 CRDi MT | Diesel | 3.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km+59% |
1.2Kia Rio 2011 1.2 MT | Petrol | 4.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+35% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 CVVT MT | Petrol | 5.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+41% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 CVVT AT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+35% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 CRDi MT | Diesel | 5.4 l/100km |
2011
Kia RIO 2011 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +38% Average real diesel consumption difference: +42%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.1Kia Rio 2011 1.1 CRDi MT | Diesel | 3.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km+59% |
1.2Kia Rio 2011 1.2 MT | Petrol | 4.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+38% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 MT | Petrol | 5.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km+41% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 AT | Petrol | 6.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+35% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 CRDi MT | Diesel | 4.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+26% |
2011
Kia RIO 2011 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +29% Average real diesel consumption difference: +26%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.1Kia RIO 2011 1.1 CRDi 12V MT | Diesel | 5.1 l/100km | |
1.2Kia RIO 2011 1.2 16V MT | Petrol | 5.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km+29% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 MT | Petrol | 5.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+24% |
1.4Kia Rio 2011 1.4 AT | Petrol | 6.4 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+33% |
1.4Kia RIO 2011 1.4 CRDi 16V MT | Diesel | 4.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km+26% |
1.6Kia Rio 2011 1.6 MT | Petrol | 6.0 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2011 1.6 AT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km |
2009
Kia RIO 2009 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +29%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Kia Rio 2009 1.3 1.4 16V MT | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+19% |
1.3Kia Rio 2009 1.3 1.4 16V AT | 6.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+39% |
2009
Kia RIO 2009 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +26%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Kia Rio 2009 1.3 1.4 16V MT | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+19% |
1.3Kia Rio 2009 1.3 1.4 16V AT | 7.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+33% |
2005
Kia RIO 2005 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +22% Average real diesel consumption difference: +23%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|---|
1.4Kia Rio 2005 1.4 97 HP MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+24% |
1.4Kia Rio 2005 1.4 97 HP AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | |
1.4Kia Rio 2007 1.4 97 HP MT | Petrol | 6.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+23% |
1.4Kia Rio 2007 1.4 97 HP AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km+33% |
1.5Kia Rio 2005 1.5 CRDi VGT 110 HP MT | Diesel | 4.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+23% |
1.5Kia Rio 2007 1.5 CRDi VGT 110 HP MT | Diesel | 4.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km+23% |
1.6Kia Rio 2005 1.6 CVVT 112 HP MT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+18% |
1.6Kia Rio 2005 1.6 CVVT 112 HP AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+18% |
1.6Kia Rio 2007 1.6 CVVT 112 HP MT | Petrol | 6.5 l/100km | |
1.6Kia Rio 2007 1.6 CVVT 112 HP AT | Petrol | 7.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km+15% |
2003
Kia RIO 2003 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Kia Rio 2003 1.3 MT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+9% |
1.5Kia Rio 2003 1.5 MT | 7.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+7% |
1.5Kia Rio 2003 1.5 AT | 8.3 l/100km |
2003
Kia RIO 2003 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +8%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Kia Rio 2003 1.3 MT | 6.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km+9% |
1.5Kia Rio 2003 1.5 97 HP MT | 7.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+7% |
1.5Kia Rio 2003 1.5 97 HP AT | 8.3 l/100km | |
1.5Kia Rio 2003 1.5 108 HP MT | 7.3 l/100km |
2000
Kia RIO 2000 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Kia Rio 2000 1.3 MT | 7.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+16% |
1.5Kia Rio 2000 1.5 96 HP MT | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+10% |
1.5Kia Rio 2000 1.5 96 HP AT | 8.3 l/100km | |
1.5Kia Rio 2000 1.5 i 108 HP MT | 7.3 l/100km | |
1.5Kia RIO 2000 1.5 i 16V 108 HP AT | 8.7 l/100km |
1999
Kia RIO 1999 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +13%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia RIO versions are shown in the table below.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3Kia Rio 2000 1.3 MT | 7.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+16% |
1.5Kia Rio 2000 1.5 96 HP MT | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km+10% |
1.5Kia Rio 2000 1.5 96 HP AT | 7.2 l/100km | |
1.5Kia RIO 1999 1.5i 16V 108 HP MT | 7.3 l/100km | |
1.5Kia RIO 1999 1.5i 16V 108 HP AT | 8.7 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.