Real Kia Cerato fuel consumption
Kia Cerato real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 24% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 21% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 28% higher.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2004
Kia Cerato 2004 sedan
Average real petrol consumption difference: +22% Average real diesel consumption difference: +33%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia Cerato versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5KIA Cerato 2004 1.5L CRDi MT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | |
| 1.6Kia Cerato 2004 1.6 AT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | |
| 1.6Kia Cerato 2004 1.6 MT | Petrol | 6.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+25% |
| 1.6Kia Cerato 2006 1.6 CRDi VGT MT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km+33% |
| 2.0Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 CVVT MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 CVVT AT | Petrol | 8.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 CRDi MT | Diesel | 5.8 l/100km |
2004
Kia Cerato 2004 hatchback
Average real petrol consumption difference: +20% Average real diesel consumption difference: +22%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Kia Cerato versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5Kia Cerato 2004 1.5 CRDi MT | Diesel | 4.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km+27% |
| 1.6Kia Cerato 2004 1.6 MT | Petrol | 7.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km+21% |
| 1.6Kia Cerato 2004 1.6 AT | Petrol | 7.8 l/100km | |
| 1.6Kia Cerato 2006 1.6 CRDi VGT MT | Diesel | 6.5 l/100km | |
| 2.0Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 CVVT MT | Petrol | 7.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km+19% |
| 2.0Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 CVVT AT | Petrol | 8.3 l/100km | |
| 2.0Kia Cerato 2004 2.0 CRDi MT | Diesel | 6.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km+18% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.