Real Ford Kuga fuel consumption
Ford Kuga real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 30% higher compared to official consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 27% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 34% higher. Above consumption difference is the average for all Ford Kuga produced from 2008 to 2022. For Ford Kuga produced up to 2015 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +24%, while for those produced after 2015 it is on average +33%.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
Average difference between user reported and stated consumption
All carmakers average fuel economy difference between advertised and user reported
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2016
Ford Kuga 2016
Average real petrol consumption difference: +36%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Kuga versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 EcoBoost 4WD 150 Hp 150 HP AT | 8.0 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+33% |
| 1.5Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 EcoBoost 4WD 182 Hp 182 HP AT | 7.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km+45% |
| 1.5Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 TDCI MT | 4.4 l/100km | |
| 1.5Ford Kuga 2016 1.5 TDCI Automatic AT | 4.8 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2017 2.0 EcoBoost AT 4x4 | 8.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 150 Hp 150 HP MT | 4.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 150 Hp 4x4 150 HP MT | 5.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 150 Hp Automatic 4x4 150 HP AT | 5.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 180 Hp 4x4 180 HP MT | 5.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2016 2.0 TDCI 180 Hp Automatic 4x4 180 HP AT | 5.2 l/100km | |
| 2.5Ford Kuga 2016 2.5 AT | 8.1 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km+31% |
2013
Ford Kuga 2013
Average real petrol consumption difference: +32% Average real diesel consumption difference: +27%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Kuga versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 150 HP MT | Petrol | 6.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+27% |
| 1.6Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 4WD 150 Hp Automatic 4x4 150 HP AT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | |
| 1.6Ford Kuga 2013 1.6 EcoBoost 4WD 182 Hp 182 HP AT | Petrol | 7.7 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km+36% |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 140 Hp 140 HP AT | Diesel | 6.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km+24% |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 163 Hp 4x4 163 HP MT | Diesel | 5.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km+27% |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2013 2.0 TDCi 4WD 163 Hp Automatic 4x4 163 HP AT | Diesel | 6.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km+29% |
2008
Ford Kuga 2008
Average real petrol consumption difference: +12% Average real diesel consumption difference: +40%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Ford Kuga versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Fuel | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2008 2.0 TDCi 136 HP MT | Diesel | 5.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km+40% |
| 2.0Ford Kuga 2008 2.0 TDCi 4x4 136 HP MT | Diesel | 6.4 l/100km | |
| 2.5Ford Kuga 2008 2.5 Turbo AWD Automatic 4x4 AT | Petrol | 10.3 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km+12% |
| 2.5Ford Kuga 2009 2.5 Turbo AWD MT | Petrol | 9.9 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km+12% |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.