Real Fiat Ulysse fuel consumption
Fiat Ulysse real fuel consumption by user reviews is approximately 10% higher compared to official consumption.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
See below for the actual consumption of each generation and version.
2002
Fiat Ulysse 2002
Average real diesel consumption difference: +7%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Ulysse versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v MT | 9.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v Automatic AT | 9.6 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v JTD 109 HP MT | 7.0 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.0 16v JTD Automatic 109 HP AT | 8.0 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2006 2.0 16v Multijet 120 Hp 120 HP MT | 6.9 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2006 2.0 16v Multijet 136 Hp 136 HP MT | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km0% |
| 2.2Fiat Ulysse 2002 2.2 16v JTD 128 HP MT | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km+14% |
| 2.2Fiat Ulysse 2004 2.2 16v JTD 128 HP MT | 7.3 l/100km | |
| 2.9Fiat Ulysse 2003 2.9 3.0 V6 24v AT | 11.5 l/100km |
1999
Fiat Ulysse 1999
Average real diesel consumption difference: +12%
Real and specified fuel consumption and differences for specific Fiat Ulysse versions are shown in the table below.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8Fiat Ulysse 1999 1.8 MT | 10.3 l/100km | |
| 1.9Fiat Ulysse 1999 1.9 Tds MT | 8.1 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.0 121 HP MT | 10.6 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.0 16v 136 HP MT | 9.2 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2000 2.0 16v Automatic 136 HP AT | 9.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.0 JTD 109 HP MT | 6.7 l/100km | |
| 2.0Fiat Ulysse 2001 2.0 16v JTD 109 HP MT | 6.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km+12% |
| 2.1Fiat Ulysse 1999 2.1 Tds MT | 8.2 l/100km |
Real fuel consumption of other carmakers
The fuel consumption reported by users does not reflect the experience of all users, may be selective (depending on the driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the car and other circumstances) and should therefore not be taken as a representative indicator.